Abstract 5586
Background
The development of new therapeutic options for cancer patients due to a better understanding of tumor biology has profound effects on the design and conduct of modern clinical cancer research especially with respect to clinical trial design. Until recently, cancer drugs have been investigated in clinical trials for a definitive histological tumor type but this approach is slowly changing and recently drugs have been approved rather histology agnostic based on genomic alterations in various histological tumor types. Here we investigated the changes in the landscape of clinical cancer trials in Germany from 2000-2016.
Methods
Clinical trials gov database was queried in 2017 for interventional clinical cancer trials running in Germany with study start between 01/01/2000 and 31/12/2016. Data extracted from the database included the conditions, interventions, study phase, Sponsor/Collaborators, funder type, study design, outcome measures and number enrolled.
Results
Overall, 2977 trials matching the criteria were extracted. Number of studies heavily increased within the first decade from 32 studies in 2000 to 214 studies in 2010, remained thereafter relatively stable (with 260 in 2011, 243 in 2012, 236 in 2013, 252 in 2014, 274 in 2015 to 224 in 2016). There was a clear change in the study design over the years towards more trials with a placebo. Furthermore, the number of entities investigated within one clinical trial (from 1 tumor entity, 2-5 tumor entities, 6-10 tumor entities and >10 tumor entities (including clinical trials targeting events from various entities) increased over the years. With respect to sponsorship, there was an increase of industry-alone sponsorship over the years.Table: 1638PD
2000 - 2004 | 2005 - 2009 | 2010 - 2014 | 2015 - 2016 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Masking | ||||
open label | 78% | 75% | 73% | 77% |
single blind | 1% | 3% | 3% | 4% |
double blind | 12% | 20% | 18% | 12% |
quadruple | 1% | 2% | 6% | 6% |
Missing | 9% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
Placebo | ||||
Placebo - no | 95% | 82% | 80% | 85% |
Placebo - yes | 5% | 18% | 20% | 15% |
Number of entities | ||||
1 | 88% | 91% | 89% | 85% |
2 - 5 | 6% | 3% | 4% | 5% |
6 - 10 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
> 10 | 6% | 5% | 7% | 10% |
Sponsorship | ||||
Industrie alone | 43% | 68% | 65% | 64% |
other | 57% | 32% | 35% | 36% |
Conclusions
Cancer clinical trials have changed with respect to trial design and sponsorship during the last decade to cope with recent development of new cancer therapeutics.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
T. Füreder: Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Research grant / Funding (institution): Norvartis; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: BMS; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self), Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: MSD; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck Darmstadt; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Boehringer Ingelheim; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Research grant / Funding (institution): Sanofi; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Research grant / Funding (institution): Accord; Honoraria (institution), Research grant / Funding (institution): Celegene; Honoraria (institution), Research grant / Funding (institution): Ipsen; Honoraria (institution), Research grant / Funding (institution): Astellas; Non-remunerated activity/ies: President elect Austrian Head and Neck cancer society; Full / Part-time employment: Medical University of Vienna; Honoraria (institution): Johnson and Johnson ; Research grant / Funding (institution): Amgen. U. Keilholz: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Bristol-Myers Squibb; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: Serono; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: MSD Oncology; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Pfizer; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Novartis; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Glycotope GmbH. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2162 - Clinical Benefit and Prices of Cancer Drugs in the US and Europe
Presenter: Kerstin Vokinger
Session: Poster Discussion - Public policy
Resources:
Abstract
4743 - Determinants of the Cancer Drug Funding Process in Canada
Presenter: Joanna Gotfrit
Session: Poster Discussion - Public policy
Resources:
Abstract
6081 - Biosimilar Substitution: European Prescriber Perspectives
Presenter: Michael Reilly
Session: Poster Discussion - Public policy
Resources:
Abstract
1218 - Cost avoided in drugs derived from participation in clinical trials in colorectal cancer
Presenter: Luis Sánchez- Rubio Ferrández
Session: Poster Discussion - Public policy
Resources:
Abstract
3453 - Accessibility and Affordability to Trastuzumab for Breast cancer patients: voices of the Global Oncology community from ONCOLLEGE 001 survey – part 2
Presenter: Sara Altuna
Session: Poster Discussion - Public policy
Resources:
Abstract
3302 - Poster Discussion - Public policy - Analysis of 105.000 cancer patients; have they been discussed in oncologic multidisciplinary team meetings? A nationwide population-based study in the Netherlands
Presenter: Janneke Walraven
Session: Poster Discussion - Public policy
Resources:
Abstract
5246 - Reaching sustainable oncology care via the National Cancer Control Program (NCCP)
Presenter: Branko Zakotnik
Session: Poster Discussion - Public policy
Resources:
Abstract
5192 - Comparison between phase III randomized clinical trials and their preceeding phase II studies.
Presenter: Ivan Lyra-Gonzalez
Session: Poster Discussion - Public policy
Resources:
Abstract
5811 - Projecting overall survival data for health-economic models in oncology: do maturity levels impact uncertainty?
Presenter: Isabelle Borget
Session: Poster Discussion - Public policy
Resources:
Abstract
1801 - Implementation Frameworks to effectively transition complex research interventions into clinical practice in Oncology, Nuclear Medicine, Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology; A scoping Systematic Review
Presenter: Gayathri Delanerolle
Session: Poster Discussion - Public policy
Resources:
Abstract