Abstract 331P
Background
SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) has killed over five hundred thousand people and has infected over 13 million people across the world in over 200 countries. Cancer patients fall under the high-risk category and are susceptible to the SARS-CoV-2 infection given the need for frequent hospital visits.
Methods
In this study, I analysed data from 46 cancer patients who were affected with different types of cancers (Table) and continued to receive cytotoxic treatment between January 2020 till July 2020. Table: 331P
Summary of the types of cancer and the treatment regimen of the 46 patients
Type of cancer | Number of patients | Treatment regimen |
Astrocytoma | 1 | Temodal + Bevacizumab |
Breast | 3 | EC + T |
Breast | 8 | EC + TC |
Breast | 4 | EC + THP |
Colorectal cancer | 4 | FOLFOX |
Colorectal cancer | 3 | FOLFIRI |
Colorectal cancer | 1 | FOLFOX + Bevacizumab |
Ewing sarcoma | 1 | VCD/IE |
Gastric cancer | 4 | FLOT |
Gastric cancer | 2 | XELOX |
Lung cancer | 4 | Docetaxel + Carboplatin |
Lung cancer | 1 | Topotecan |
Lung cancer | 4 | Etoposide + Carboplatin |
Lung cancer | 1 | Docetaxel + Cisplatin |
Osteosarcoma | 1 | OS99 |
Osteosarcoma | 1 | HD-MTX |
Pancreatic cancer | 2 | FOLFIRINOX |
Small bowel | 1 | FOLFOX |
Results
All the 46 patients included in the study completed their cytotoxic regimen without developing SARS-CoV-2 infection between January till July 2020.
Conclusions
The results from the study led to the hypothesis that three factors which were common among the cancer patients included in the study namely, 1) the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), 2) the use of dexamethasone and, 3) dysbiosis of microbiome among cancer patients might be potential reasons for evading the deadly SARS-CoV-2 infection, despite their compromised immune status and a high likelihood of repeated exposure during hospital visits in comparison to the healthy general population, who are less likely to visit hospitals during the pandemic. The study aims to provide an alternate perspective and instigate discussion over the continuation of providing cancer care amidst the pandemic.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The author.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
434P - Pan-Canadian evidence-based, consensus-driven cancer treatment protocols/information for use at the point of care by medical oncologists? Is there a need?
Presenter: Kiran Virik
Session: e-Poster Display Session
435P - Hypnotics and risk of cancer: A meta-analysis of observational studies
Presenter: Tzu Rong Peng
Session: e-Poster Display Session
436P - Clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes of adolescent and young adult (AYA) melanoma: Results from an Asian perspective
Presenter: Wei Lin Goh
Session: e-Poster Display Session
437P - Long-term efficacy and toxicity outcome of adjuvant external beam radiotherapy for medullary thyroid cancer: A single institution cohort study
Presenter: Ka Man Cheung
Session: e-Poster Display Session
438P - Real-world data of relapse after adjuvant treatment (Tx) in high-risk melanoma
Presenter: Carolina Ortiz Velez
Session: e-Poster Display Session
439P - Immunohistochemical analysis of p53 and Ki-67 in glioblastoma (GBM) and their correlations with patient survival
Presenter: Paulo Luz
Session: e-Poster Display Session
440P - Blinded independent central review of oncology trials: The monitoring of readers' performance
Presenter: Hubert Beaumont
Session: e-Poster Display Session
441P - Influence of radiation therapy of patients with somatotropic pituitary adenomas depending on the age of patients
Presenter: Saodat Issaeva
Session: e-Poster Display Session
442P - Results from the registrational phase I/II ARROW trial of pralsetinib (BLU-667) in patients (pts) with advanced RET mutation-positive medullary thyroid cancer (RET+ MTC)
Presenter: Bhumsuk Keam
Session: e-Poster Display Session