Abstract 331P
Background
SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) has killed over five hundred thousand people and has infected over 13 million people across the world in over 200 countries. Cancer patients fall under the high-risk category and are susceptible to the SARS-CoV-2 infection given the need for frequent hospital visits.
Methods
In this study, I analysed data from 46 cancer patients who were affected with different types of cancers (Table) and continued to receive cytotoxic treatment between January 2020 till July 2020. Table: 331P
Summary of the types of cancer and the treatment regimen of the 46 patients
Type of cancer | Number of patients | Treatment regimen |
Astrocytoma | 1 | Temodal + Bevacizumab |
Breast | 3 | EC + T |
Breast | 8 | EC + TC |
Breast | 4 | EC + THP |
Colorectal cancer | 4 | FOLFOX |
Colorectal cancer | 3 | FOLFIRI |
Colorectal cancer | 1 | FOLFOX + Bevacizumab |
Ewing sarcoma | 1 | VCD/IE |
Gastric cancer | 4 | FLOT |
Gastric cancer | 2 | XELOX |
Lung cancer | 4 | Docetaxel + Carboplatin |
Lung cancer | 1 | Topotecan |
Lung cancer | 4 | Etoposide + Carboplatin |
Lung cancer | 1 | Docetaxel + Cisplatin |
Osteosarcoma | 1 | OS99 |
Osteosarcoma | 1 | HD-MTX |
Pancreatic cancer | 2 | FOLFIRINOX |
Small bowel | 1 | FOLFOX |
Results
All the 46 patients included in the study completed their cytotoxic regimen without developing SARS-CoV-2 infection between January till July 2020.
Conclusions
The results from the study led to the hypothesis that three factors which were common among the cancer patients included in the study namely, 1) the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), 2) the use of dexamethasone and, 3) dysbiosis of microbiome among cancer patients might be potential reasons for evading the deadly SARS-CoV-2 infection, despite their compromised immune status and a high likelihood of repeated exposure during hospital visits in comparison to the healthy general population, who are less likely to visit hospitals during the pandemic. The study aims to provide an alternate perspective and instigate discussion over the continuation of providing cancer care amidst the pandemic.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The author.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
312P - Identification of neoantigen-specific T cell response and anti-tumour immunity in pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Xiaoxiao Du
Session: e-Poster Display Session
313P - Diagnostic value of micro RNA (miRNA) in renal cell cancer: A meta-analysis and systemic review
Presenter: Jestoni Aranilla
Session: e-Poster Display Session
314P - Comprehensive microbial signatures and genomic profiling in tumour samples using next generation sequencing
Presenter: Mei Qi Yee
Session: e-Poster Display Session
315P - High-penetrance breast and/or ovarian cancer susceptibility genes in Filipinos
Presenter: Frances Victoria Que
Session: e-Poster Display Session
316P - Implementation of Vela Analytics to accelerate comprehensive interpretation and reporting of next-generation sequencing-based oncology testing in clinical diagnostic laboratories
Presenter: Yingnan Yu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
317P - Genomic profiling and molecular pathology of Chinese glioma patients
Presenter: yuanli Zhao
Session: e-Poster Display Session
320P - Psychometric interplay of the perception of the real-life impact of COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional survey of patients with newly diagnosed malignancies
Presenter: Kelvin Bao
Session: e-Poster Display Session
321P - Impact of COVID-19 and lockdown on adherence to treatment schedule among cancer patients
Presenter: Krishnamani Kalpathi
Session: e-Poster Display Session
322P - Challenged faced by cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic
Presenter: mithra Krishnamani
Session: e-Poster Display Session
323P - Oncology care in the Republic of Kazakhstan during COVID-19
Presenter: Dilyara Kaidarova
Session: e-Poster Display Session