Abstract 331P
Background
SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) has killed over five hundred thousand people and has infected over 13 million people across the world in over 200 countries. Cancer patients fall under the high-risk category and are susceptible to the SARS-CoV-2 infection given the need for frequent hospital visits.
Methods
In this study, I analysed data from 46 cancer patients who were affected with different types of cancers (Table) and continued to receive cytotoxic treatment between January 2020 till July 2020. Table: 331P
Summary of the types of cancer and the treatment regimen of the 46 patients
Type of cancer | Number of patients | Treatment regimen |
Astrocytoma | 1 | Temodal + Bevacizumab |
Breast | 3 | EC + T |
Breast | 8 | EC + TC |
Breast | 4 | EC + THP |
Colorectal cancer | 4 | FOLFOX |
Colorectal cancer | 3 | FOLFIRI |
Colorectal cancer | 1 | FOLFOX + Bevacizumab |
Ewing sarcoma | 1 | VCD/IE |
Gastric cancer | 4 | FLOT |
Gastric cancer | 2 | XELOX |
Lung cancer | 4 | Docetaxel + Carboplatin |
Lung cancer | 1 | Topotecan |
Lung cancer | 4 | Etoposide + Carboplatin |
Lung cancer | 1 | Docetaxel + Cisplatin |
Osteosarcoma | 1 | OS99 |
Osteosarcoma | 1 | HD-MTX |
Pancreatic cancer | 2 | FOLFIRINOX |
Small bowel | 1 | FOLFOX |
Results
All the 46 patients included in the study completed their cytotoxic regimen without developing SARS-CoV-2 infection between January till July 2020.
Conclusions
The results from the study led to the hypothesis that three factors which were common among the cancer patients included in the study namely, 1) the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), 2) the use of dexamethasone and, 3) dysbiosis of microbiome among cancer patients might be potential reasons for evading the deadly SARS-CoV-2 infection, despite their compromised immune status and a high likelihood of repeated exposure during hospital visits in comparison to the healthy general population, who are less likely to visit hospitals during the pandemic. The study aims to provide an alternate perspective and instigate discussion over the continuation of providing cancer care amidst the pandemic.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The author.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
210P - Prognostic value of sarcopenia in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients: A systematic review
Presenter: Angeline Tancherla
Session: e-Poster Display Session
211P - The impact of low muscle mass to overall survival in bladder cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Karunia Japar
Session: e-Poster Display Session
212P - Stage I non-seminoma testicular cancer: Adjuvant management and outcomes
Presenter: Gaik Tin Quah
Session: e-Poster Display Session
213P - Stage I seminoma testicular cancer: Predictors of relapse and outcomes for adjuvant carboplatin vs active surveillance
Presenter: Gaik Tin Quah
Session: e-Poster Display Session
214P - Study of treatment outcome in adults with TFE related RCC
Presenter: Ajaykumar Singh
Session: e-Poster Display Session
215P - Analysis of spatial heterogeneity of responses in metastatic sites with nivolumab in renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Venkata Pradeep Babu Koyyala
Session: e-Poster Display Session
216P - Clinical profile and treatment outcome of testicular seminoma treated at tertiary care centre in Chennai
Presenter: Sivasubramaniam Kumaravelu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
220P - A cost-effectiveness analysis of systemic therapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer
Presenter: Winnie Sung
Session: e-Poster Display Session
221P - Patient-reported sexual and urinary function in nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) when treated with apalutamide (APA) vs placebo (PBO) and ongoing androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in SPARTAN
Presenter: Hiroji Uemura
Session: e-Poster Display Session
222P - Tolerability and treatment response to darolutamide (DARO) in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) in the phase III ARAMIS trial
Presenter: Matthew R. Smith
Session: e-Poster Display Session