Abstract 12P
Background
The tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), especially stromal TILs, have showed a prognostic role in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive and triple negative breast cancer. Stromal TILs are associated with higher pathological complete remission (pCR) rates after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, the relation between stromal TILs in primary breast cancer and axillary nodal metastasis remains uncertain.
Methods
A retrospective review of pathological reports of 763 patients with breast infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC) was conducted. The gene expression and clinical data of 662 IDC cases were downloaded from the TCGA database. In silico analysis was based on the gene expression data. The “Estimation of STromal and Immune cells in MAlignant Tumor tissues using Expression data” (ESTIMATE) algorithm was used to calculate the stromal and immune scores in N0 and N+ cases.
Results
In HER2+ breast cancer, the fractions of stromal TILs are higher than 30% (37.57% versus 19.67%, P=0.01) and 40% (25.97% vs 8.20%, P=0.003) in lymph node negative cases comparing to nodal metastasis cases. The fractions of stromal TILs in HER2- breast cancer showed no difference between N0 and N+ stage cases. We further compare the fractions of stromal TILs between N0 and N+ cases in different subtypes of breast cancer cases. The stromal TILs (%) is only higher in primary tumors of N0 HER2 amplified breast cancer cases than N+ cases (P=0.014). The stromal TILs (%) of primary tumors are similar between N0 and N+ cases in Luminal A (hormone receptor (HR)+/HER2-) (P=0.261), Luminal B (HR+/HER2+) (P=0.838) and triple negative (HR-/HER2-) subtypes (P=0.456). The primary tumors immune scores of N0 and N+ cases show no significantly difference in HER2+/- breast cancer. The stromal scores of N+ cases are higher than N0 cases in HER2+ breast cancer (P=0.015). The stromal scores are similar between N0 and N+ cases in HER2- breast cancer. Table: 12P
Stromal TILs(%) | N0(cases) | % | N+(cases) | % | P value | |
Her2+ | 0-9 | 72 | 39.78 | 28 | 45.90 | |
10- | 109 | 60.22 | 33 | 54.10 | ||
0.401 | ||||||
0-19 | 101 | 55.80 | 40 | 65.57 | ||
20- | 80 | 44.75 | 21 | 34.43 | ||
0.181 | ||||||
0-29 | 113 | 62.43 | 49 | 80.33 | ||
30- | 68 | 37.57 | 12 | 19.67 | ||
0.01 | ||||||
0-39 | 134 | 74.03 | 56 | 91.8 | ||
40- | 47 | 25.97 | 5 | 8.2 | ||
0.003 | ||||||
Stromal TILs(%) | N0(cases) | % | N+(cases) | % | P value | |
Her2+ | 0-9 | 219 | 59.03 | 83 | 55.70 | |
10- | 152 | 40.97 | 66 | 44.30 | ||
0.487 | ||||||
0-19 | 286 | 77.09 | 115 | 77.18 | ||
20- | 85 | 22.91 | 34 | 22.82 | ||
0.982 | ||||||
0-29 | 313 | 84.37 | 124 | 83.22 | ||
30- | 58 | 15.63 | 25 | 16.78 | ||
0.747 | ||||||
0-39 | 335 | 90.30 | 135 | 90.60 | ||
40- | 36 | 9.70 | 14 | 9.4 | ||
0.914 |
Conclusions
The higher fraction of stromal TILs is negatively related to lymph nodes metastasis in her2-positive breast cancer. Since the stromal fraction of tumor tissue may be higher in HER2+ N+ breast cancer, it also tends to be associated with nodal metastasis. In total, it is not the absolute quantity of immune cells, but the relative quantity of TILs in tumor stroma (which we evaluated as stromal TILs (%)) makes a vital role in predicting nodal stage of HER2 amplified IDC.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Weiqichun.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
339P - Diclofenac versus tramadol for mucositis related pain in head and neck cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiation: A phase III study
Presenter: Vikas Talreja
Session: e-Poster Display Session
340P - Omega-3 fatty acids for cancer cachexia in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis
Presenter: Alfredo Chua
Session: e-Poster Display Session
341P - Relationship between muscle mass and quality of life in breast cancer patients who underwent chemotherapy
Presenter: Andree Kurniawan
Session: e-Poster Display Session
342P - Comparison of 0.25 mg versus 0.75 mg of palonosetron in combination with aprepitant and dexamethasone for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting following cisplatin-containing chemotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer
Presenter: Satoshi Horasawa
Session: e-Poster Display Session
343P - Head-to-head comparison of palonosetron versus granisetron for prevention of chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting: Systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Chin-Hung Hsu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
344P - Single-centre analysis of anti-resorptive agent-related osteonecrosis of the jaw in lung cancer patients
Presenter: Kohei Fujita
Session: e-Poster Display Session
345P - Thromboembolic events in brain tumour patients on bevacizumab
Presenter: Gunjesh Singh
Session: e-Poster Display Session
346P - Occurence and risk factors of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with breast cancer: A hospital-based assessment in Indonesia
Presenter: Susanna Hutajulu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
347P - Histamine blockade with loratadine for prevention of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF)-associated bone pain: A meta-analysis
Presenter: Mel Valerie Ordinario
Session: e-Poster Display Session
348P - Anti-VEGF inhibitors and renal safety in onco-nephrology consortium: Urinary protein/creatinine ratio (VERSiON UP study)
Presenter: Michio Nakamura
Session: e-Poster Display Session