Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

e-Poster Display Session

347P - Histamine blockade with loratadine for prevention of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF)-associated bone pain: A meta-analysis

Date

22 Nov 2020

Session

e-Poster Display Session

Topics

Tumour Site

Colon and Rectal Cancer

Presenters

Mel Valerie Ordinario

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_6): S1371-S1377. 10.1016/annonc/annonc364

Authors

M.V. Ordinario1, J.G.P. Pandy1, M.R.C. Sebastian2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology, St. Luke's Medical Center - Quezon City, 1112 - Quezon City/PH
  • 2 Medical Oncology, St. Luke's Medical Center – Quezon City, 1102 - Quezon City/PH

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 347P

Background

Chemotherapy remains to be one of the cornerstones of cancer management. Due to the inherent ability of chemotherapy to act on rapidly dividing cells, myelosuppression is one of the noted side effects. Febrile neutropenia (FN), an oncologic emergency, may be prevented with administration of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients who are at risk for neutropenia based on type and number of myelosuppressive chemotherapy agents used, the type of cancer and patient-related factors. Most common adverse events are injection site and bone pain. Recent studies showed promising results on prevention of G-CSF induced bone pain using histamine blockade.

Methods

A systematic search of Pubmed, Cochrane, Clinical trials databases and hand search were done to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the use of Loratadine for prevention of G-CSF bone pain. Studies were appraised using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. Using the random effects model, pooled Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), results were analyzed.

Results

Two RCTs were included ( N=814). Patients in the Loratadine group reported lesser bone pain as compared to the control group, 57% and 60% respectively (OR 0.95, CI [0.81, 1.10). However, the result was not statistically significant (P=0.52).

Conclusions

Histamine blockade with Loratadine in the prevention of bone pain induced by G-CSF did not show statistically significant advantage over placebo or no prophylaxis.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.