Abstract 289P
Background
Palliative chemotherapy is the standard of care for patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Radiotherapy may be offered for patients who responded to chemotherapy for local control. However, the dose and fractionation schedules used varies between oncologists.
Methods
An online survey via email was conducted for all practicing oncologists in public hospitals in Malaysia. The questionnaires were sent to 42 oncologists. The questionnaires gathered data on their practice in giving radiotherapy to patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma who responded to palliative chemotherapy,.
Results
33 oncologists responded to the questionnaire, which gave a response rate of 78.5%. Most oncologists (85%) will give radiotherapy if patients responded to palliative chemotherapy, and 90.9% will give radiotherapy alone without concurrent chemotherapy. The radiotherapy dose fractionation schedules vary among the oncologists, with 55Gy/20 fractions/4 weeks the commonest fractionation used (30.3%), followed by 40Gy/15 fractions/3 weeks (24.2%), and 9.1% choosing schedules such 30Gy/10 fractions/2 weeks, 45Gy/15 fractions/3 weeks, and 70Gy/35 fractions/7 weeks. The other fractionations used are 52Gy/13 fractions/2.5 weeks, 50Gy/25 fractions/5 weeks, 60Gy/25 fractions/5 weeks, 66Gy/33 fractions/6.5 weeks, and 60Gy/30 fractions/6 weeks. Most oncologists will prefer a fractionation schedules of 3-4 weeks duration (75.8%), with high enough dose to give a good local control and avoiding long treatment duration, as the radiotherapy is non-curative in nature.
Conclusions
There are currently no guidelines or consensus on the optimum radiotherapy dose fractionation schedules for this group of patients. The decision for the preferred dose-fractionation schedules have to take into consideration factors such as symptoms, disease extent and comorbidity. An optimum dose-fractionation schedule which does not prolong the treatment duration and giving the best local control is very much needed, especially in situations such as the current COVID-19 pandemic.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
61P - Clinical implication of BRCA mutation in breast cancer with central nervous system metastasis
Presenter: Jwa Hoon Kim
Session: e-Poster Display Session
62P - IGF axis in breast cancer recurrence and metastasis
Presenter: Hajara Akhter
Session: e-Poster Display Session
63P - Butterfly pea (<italic>Clitoria ternatea</italic> Linn.) flower extract prevents MCF-7 HER2-positive breast cancer cell metastasis in-vitro
Presenter: Azzahra Asysyifa
Session: e-Poster Display Session
64P - Pre-treatment absolute white blood cell profile count as metastatic predictive factors in invasive ductal carcinoma breast cancer
Presenter: Wikania I Gede
Session: e-Poster Display Session
65P - The new mouse anti-nNav1.5 monoclonal antibody
Presenter: Nur Aishah Sharudin
Session: e-Poster Display Session
66P - The TILs near solid structures is a potential prognostic factor of distant metastases in the luminal HER2-negative breast cancer
Presenter: Vladimir Alifanov
Session: e-Poster Display Session
73P - Selinexor in combination with carboplatin and pemetrexed (CP) in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors: Results of an open label, single-center, multi-arm phase Ib study
Presenter: Kyaw Thein
Session: e-Poster Display Session
74P - Comprehensive transcriptome analysis of endoplasmic reticulum stress in osteosarcomas
Presenter: Yoshiyuki Suehara
Session: e-Poster Display Session
75P - The evaluation of selective sensitivity of EZH2 inhibitors based on synthetic lethality in ARID1A-deficient gastric cancer
Presenter: Leo Yamada
Session: e-Poster Display Session
76P - Targeted tumour photoImmunotherapy against triple-negative breast cancer therapy
Presenter: Vivek Raju
Session: e-Poster Display Session