Abstract 289P
Background
Palliative chemotherapy is the standard of care for patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Radiotherapy may be offered for patients who responded to chemotherapy for local control. However, the dose and fractionation schedules used varies between oncologists.
Methods
An online survey via email was conducted for all practicing oncologists in public hospitals in Malaysia. The questionnaires were sent to 42 oncologists. The questionnaires gathered data on their practice in giving radiotherapy to patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma who responded to palliative chemotherapy,.
Results
33 oncologists responded to the questionnaire, which gave a response rate of 78.5%. Most oncologists (85%) will give radiotherapy if patients responded to palliative chemotherapy, and 90.9% will give radiotherapy alone without concurrent chemotherapy. The radiotherapy dose fractionation schedules vary among the oncologists, with 55Gy/20 fractions/4 weeks the commonest fractionation used (30.3%), followed by 40Gy/15 fractions/3 weeks (24.2%), and 9.1% choosing schedules such 30Gy/10 fractions/2 weeks, 45Gy/15 fractions/3 weeks, and 70Gy/35 fractions/7 weeks. The other fractionations used are 52Gy/13 fractions/2.5 weeks, 50Gy/25 fractions/5 weeks, 60Gy/25 fractions/5 weeks, 66Gy/33 fractions/6.5 weeks, and 60Gy/30 fractions/6 weeks. Most oncologists will prefer a fractionation schedules of 3-4 weeks duration (75.8%), with high enough dose to give a good local control and avoiding long treatment duration, as the radiotherapy is non-curative in nature.
Conclusions
There are currently no guidelines or consensus on the optimum radiotherapy dose fractionation schedules for this group of patients. The decision for the preferred dose-fractionation schedules have to take into consideration factors such as symptoms, disease extent and comorbidity. An optimum dose-fractionation schedule which does not prolong the treatment duration and giving the best local control is very much needed, especially in situations such as the current COVID-19 pandemic.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
34P - Clinical significance of neoadjuvant dose-dense chemotherapy for II and III stage breast cancer: A meta-analysis of published studies
Presenter: Meng chen Liu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
35P - Pathological response to weekly nabpaclitaxel and carboplatin followed by anthracycline regimen in triple negative breast cancer
Presenter: Goteti Sharat Chandra
Session: e-Poster Display Session
36P - Survival in patients with contralateral breast cancer
Presenter: Sergey Kamishov
Session: e-Poster Display Session
37P - Correlation between haematological toxicity with quality of life in breast cancer patients after first-cycle chemotherapy
Presenter: felix Wijovi
Session: e-Poster Display Session
38P - Evaluation of the prognostic value of innate immunity-related biomarkers in early breast cancer (BC)
Presenter: Veronica Martini
Session: e-Poster Display Session
39P - CSF-1R inhibitor (C019199) enhances antitumor effect in combination with anti-PD-1 therapy on murine breast cancer models
Presenter: Jiani Zheng
Session: e-Poster Display Session
40P - Molecular subtypes and imaging phenotypes of breast cancer: MRI
Presenter: Yulduz Khatamovna
Session: e-Poster Display Session
41P - Mir-223 overexpression is associated with increased expression of EGFR and worse prognosis in Indonesian TNBC patients
Presenter: Ibnu Purwanto
Session: e-Poster Display Session
42P - Impact of germline mutations on breast cancer prognosis in Kazakh population
Presenter: Dilyara Kaidarova
Session: e-Poster Display Session
50P - Efficacy and safety analysis of pyrotinib in lapatinib resistant HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: A retrospective study
Presenter: Yijia Hua
Session: e-Poster Display Session