Abstract 105P
Background
Cetuximab-based infusional 5-FU regimens are approved for the first-line treatment of mCRC in 116 countries. The OPTIM1SE study observed long-term real-world outcomes of these regimens in routine practice in Australia, South Korea, Malaysia, Singapore, Taiwan, Vietnam, Russia, Lebanon, and Saudi Arabia.
Methods
OPTIM1SE was a prospective, open-label, observational study. Patients with untreated KRAS wild-type mCRC and distant metastases were treated per the locally approved label and monitored for 3 years via hospital, laboratory, and other records. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1. Safety and other efficacy outcomes were secondary endpoints.
Results
From 19 Nov 2013 to 30 Jun 2016, 520 patients were enrolled by 51 sites. Patients were mostly male (61.2%) with a mean age of 58.5 (±12.0) years; 1.7% were BRAF mutated; 420 patients were treated with FOLFIRI-based regimens and 94 with FOLFOX. The most common primary tumor site was rectum (38.8%) with liver metastases (65.0%). ORR was 45.4% (95% CI, 41.1%-49.7%), including 26 patients (5.0%) with a complete response. Median progression-free survival was 9.9 months (95% CI, 8.2-11.0); median overall survival (mOS) was 30.8 months (95% CI, 27.9-33.6). Patients receiving FOLFIRI-based regimens had better outcomes than those on FOLFOX, including increased ORR (48.6% vs 34.0%) and mOS (31.3 vs 28.6 months). Higher mOS was also associated with tumors of left- rather than right-sided origin (HR 0.69 [95% CI, 0.49-0.99]), and higher ORR with liver metastases compared to all other metastases (55.4% vs 40.2%). Adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of cetuximab. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) were rash (20.2%), dermatitis acneiform (16.5%), and paronychia (13.7%); 2.1% of patients had a serious TRAE.
Conclusions
Cetuximab-based 5-FU regimens were effective in treating patients with mCRC, particuarly in those with left-sided disease origin and with liver metastases only, in routine practice. FOLFIRI-based cetuximab regimens were more common and showed improved outcomes over FOLFOX. Our findings are consistent with recent studies.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Medical editorial asssistance provided by Kristen Perry and Tim Stentiford, CMPP, of ClinicalThinking, part of Nucleus Global, and was funded by Merck Pte. Ltd.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Merck Pte. Ltd.
Funding
Merck Pte. Ltd.
Disclosure
T.W. Kim: Research grant/Funding (institution): Merck Serono; Research grant/Funding (institution): Sanofi. J.B. Ahn: Research grant/Funding (institution): Sanofi; Research grant/Funding (institution): Boryung. G.F. Ho: Honoraria (self): Roche; Advisory/Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory/Consultancy: Boehringer Ingelheim; Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): Eli Lilly; Research grant/Funding (institution): Merck Sharp & Dohme; Research grant/Funding (institution): Regeneron; Research grant/Funding (institution): Astellas; Research grant/Funding (institution): AB Science; Research grant/Funding (institution): Tessa Therapeutics; Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Eisai; Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: AstraZeneca; Full/Part-time employment: University Malaya Medical Centre; Full/Part-time employment: UM Specialist Centre. L.T. Anh: Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Merck KGaA; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Roche; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: MSD; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Bayer; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Pfizer; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Novartis. S. Temraz: Honoraria (self), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: BMS; Honoraria (self), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Amgen; Advisory/Consultancy, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Merck KGaA; Advisory/Consultancy, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: MSD. M. Burge: Advisory/Consultancy: Merck KGaA. C. Chua: Research grant/Funding (institution): MSD; Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: AstraZeneca; Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Sanofi; Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Merck KGaA. J. Huang: Full/Part-time employment: Merck Pte Ltd. Y.S. Park: Advisory/Consultancy: Merck KGaA; Full/Part-time employment: Samsung Medical Center. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
124P - Prospective evaluation of pattern of care and quality of life in patients undergoing esophagectomy at a high-volume regional cancer centre in South India
Presenter: Faheem Abdulla
Session: e-Poster Display Session
125P - Analysis of esophageal cancer incidence for last 20 years in Uzbekistan
Presenter: Abrorjon Yusupbekov
Session: e-Poster Display Session
126P - A phase II study of rh-endostatin combined with irinotecan plus cisplatin as the second-line treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)
Presenter: Jianhua Chang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
128P - Clinical update with plasma and tumour-based genomic analyses in expansion part of phase I study of selective FGFR inhibitor E7090
Presenter: Chigusa Morizane
Session: e-Poster Display Session
129P - Exploration of the best candidates for splenic hilar lymph node dissection (No.10 LND) based on long-term survival: Stage IIIA proximal gastric cancer may benefit from No.10 LND
Presenter: Zu-Kai Wang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
130P - Reappraisal of the role of no. 10 lymphadenectomy for proximal gastric cancer in the era of minimal invasive surgery during total gastrectomy: A pooled analysis of 4 prospective trials
Presenter: Qing Zhong
Session: e-Poster Display Session
131P - Prognostic value of tumour regression grading (TRG) in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery for gastric cancer
Presenter: Jian-Wei Xie
Session: e-Poster Display Session
132P - Impact of increasing age on cancer- and noncancer-specific mortality in patients with gastric cancer treated by radical surgery: A competing risk analysis
Presenter: Long-Long Cao
Session: e-Poster Display Session
133P - Which patient subgroup needs more attention in early treatment failure? A matched cohort study of treatment failure patterns in locally advanced gastric cancer
Presenter: Dong Wu
Session: e-Poster Display Session