Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

e-Poster Display Session

131P - Prognostic value of tumour regression grading (TRG) in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery for gastric cancer

Date

22 Nov 2020

Session

e-Poster Display Session

Topics

Cytotoxic Therapy;  Surgical Oncology

Tumour Site

Gastric Cancer

Presenters

Jian-Wei Xie

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_6): S1287-S1318. 10.1016/annonc/annonc356

Authors

J. Xie, Z. Xue, Y. Wu, J. Lu, C. Zheng, P. Li, J. Wang, J. Lin, Q. Chen, L. Cao, M. Lin, R. Tu, Z. Huang, J. Lin, H. Zheng, C. Huang

Author affiliations

  • Department Of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, 350001 - Fuzhou/CN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 131P

Background

The factors associated with a better tumor response rate and an optimal neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen are uncertain. We aimed to validate the prognostic value of tumor regression grading (TRG) and explore the associated factors of TRG for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) plus surgery.

Methods

Three hundred forty-four AGC patients treated with NACT followed by gastrectomy at the Mayo Clinic, USA and the Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, China between January 2000 and December 2016 were enrolled in this study. Cox regression was used to identify covariates associated with overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Logistic regression was used to reveal factors predicting the tumor regression grading.

Results

For patients with TRG 0-1, the 3- and 5-year OS rates were 85.2% and 74.5%, respectively, when compared to 56.1% and 44.1% in patients with TRG 2 and 28.2% and 23.0% in patients with TRG 3, respectively(p=0.000). TRGs were independent risk factors for OS. Similar findings were observed in RFS. The oxaliplatin-based regimen was superior to the non-oxaliplatin-based regimen for the OS (38.4m vs 19.5m, respectively; p=0.01). Subgroup analyses by histological subtype indicated that the oxaliplatin-based regimen improved the OS in non-signet ring cell carcinoma compared to the non-oxaliplatin-based regimen (53.7m vs 19.5m, respectively; p=0.011). However, Similar findings were not observed in RFS.

Conclusions

TRG was an independent factor of AGC treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery. Oxaliplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens improve tumor response and may have an overall survival benefit for patients with non-signet ring cell carcinoma.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Scientific and Technological Innovation Joint Capital Projects of Fujian Province.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.