Abstract 142P
Background
To investigate the incidence and prognosis of intra-abdominal infectious complications (IaIC) after laparoscopic and open radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer.
Methods
The data of patients who underwent radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer at the Fujian Medical University Union Hospital from January 2000 to December 2014, retrospectively LAG and OG were used. 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce biases. The incidence and prognosis of postoperative IaIC in the two groups were analyzed.
Results
The incidence of IaIC after OG and LAG was 4.1% and 5.1%, respectively(p=0.264). Cox multivariate analysis showed that IaIC was an independent risk factor for overall survival (OS) of patients undergoing gastrectomy (HR: 1.65, 95%CI: 1.23-2.20, p<0.001). Analysis also showed that LAG was an independent protective factor for OS with IaIC (HR 0.54, 95%CI: 0.31-0.96, p=0.036), and tumor diameter ≥ 50 mm (p=0.01) and pTNM III stage (p<0.001) were independent risk factors. After PSM, the five-year OS rate of patients with IaIC in the LAG was higher than that in the OG (51.1% vs. 32.4%, p=0.042). The independent preoperative risk factors for IaIC include male (OR 1.82, p=0.046) and BMI ≥ 25 (OR 1.88, p=0.021). Among patients with IaIC, the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) in OG group was similar to that in LAG group before operation (p=0.220), but lower than that in LAG group on the 1st, 3rd, and 5th day after surgery (p<0.05).
Conclusions
Compared to OG, LAG can improve the prognosis of patients with postoperative IaIC. For high-risk patients with IaIC, LAG is recommended.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Scientific and Technological Innovation Joint Capital Projects of Fujian Province.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
104P - Safety and efficacy of HLX04 versus reference bevacizumab in combination with XELOX or mFOLFOX6 as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: A randomised, double-blind phase III study
Presenter: Shukui Qin
Session: e-Poster Display Session
105P - Prospective, open-label, observational study of cetuximab for metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC): The OPTIM1SE study
Presenter: Tsai-Sheng Yang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
106P - Efficacy and tolerability of capecitabine and mitomycin-C based concurrent radiotherapy in patients with anal canal cancer
Presenter: Prabhat Bhargava
Session: e-Poster Display Session
107P - Safety and efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) in previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Results from the Australian cohort of the phase IIIb, international, open-label, early-access PRECONNECT study
Presenter: Timothy Price
Session: e-Poster Display Session
108P - Comparative analysis of two-stage hepatectomy and enhanced one-stage hepatectomy in the setting of bilobar colorectal liver metastases
Presenter: Hayk Torgomyan
Session: e-Poster Display Session
109P - Efficacy and safety of biweekly or triweekly XELOX regimen for adjuvant chemotherapy of colorectal cancer
Presenter: hangyu zhang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
110P - Analysis for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) effect for colorectal liver metastases
Presenter: Wei Zou
Session: e-Poster Display Session
111P - A meta-analysis study on safety and effectiveness comparison between FOLFOX and XELOX regiments on advanced stage colorectal cancer
Presenter: Ida Bagus Budhi
Session: e-Poster Display Session
112P - Pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy in patients with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair deficient metastatic colorectal cancer: Asia subgroup results of the phase III KEYNOTE-177 study
Presenter: Takayuki Yoshino
Session: e-Poster Display Session
122P - Nomogram to predict short-term effect of radiotherapy based on pre/post-treatment inflammatory biomarkers and their dynamic changes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Presenter: Shuai Liang
Session: e-Poster Display Session