Abstract 140P
Background
Preoperative and postoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) levels are related to the prognosis for cancer patients. This study aimed to explore the predictive value of combining the two in gastric cancer (GC) patients.
Methods
Patients in a clinical trial (NCT02327481) from January 2015 to April 2016 were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROCs) were generated. By calculating the areas under the curve (AUC) and the C-index, the discriminative ability of CRP during different periods were compared, including preoperative (pre-CRP), postoperative days 1, 3, and 5 (post-CRPs) and postoperative maximum CRP (post-CRPmax).
Results
Ultimately, 401 patients were included in this study. The median follow-up time was 42 months (range 3-51 months). For postoperative recurrence, the AUC and C-index of pre-CRP were 0.692 and 0.678, respectively, higher than those for post-CRPs, all p<0.05. Among post-CRPs, post-CRPmax had the highest AUC (0.591) and C-index (0.585). The optimal cut-off values for pre-CRP and post-CRPmax were 3.1mg/L and 77.1mg/L, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed both pre-CRP≥3.1mg/L (high-pre-CRP) and post-CRPmax≥77.1mg/L (high-post-CRPmax) were independent factors for recurrence-free survival (RFS). The model consisting of the pre-CRP, post-CRPmax and TNM had higher predictive ability and clinical utility. Adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) benefit analysis for stage II/III GC showed patients with pre-CRP<3.1mg/L did not benefit from chemotherapy (RFS:90.0% nonchemotherapy group vs 80.7% chemotherapy group, p=0.557). In the high-pre-CRP group, only patients with high-post-CRPmax but not post-CRPmax<77.1mg/L benefited from chemotherapy (RFS:33.2% nonchemotherapy group vs 49.9% chemotherapy group, p=0.037). Similar findings were observed for overall survival.
Conclusions
Both pre-CRP and post-CRPmax, inexpensively and easily obtained, are independent predictors of recurrence for GC. ACT significantly prolonged the RFS for stage II/III GC with high-pre-CRP and high-post-CRPmax after R0 resection.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Scientific and Technological Innovation Joint Capital Projects of Fujian Province.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
77P - Dual targeting oxidative phosphorylation and glycolysis in triple-negative breast cancers: En route to effective inhibition of tumour metabolism
Presenter: Alexander Scherbakov
Session: e-Poster Display Session
78P - Novel allogeneic cell immunotherapy for advanced cancers
Presenter: Ratnavelu Kananathan
Session: e-Poster Display Session
86P - The impact of sarcopenia on chemotherapy toxicity and survival rate among colorectal cancer patients who underwent chemotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Timotius Hariyanto
Session: e-Poster Display Session
87P - Predictive risk factors and online nomograms for colon cancer with synchronous liver metastasis
Presenter: Yajuan Zhu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
88P - Research of radiomics based on indeterminate lung nodules predicting prognosis of LARC patients
Presenter: Zhang Zhiyuan
Session: e-Poster Display Session
89P - Biomarker analysis of regorafenib dose escalation study (RECC study): A phase II multicenter clinical trial in Japan
Presenter: Masanobu Enomoto
Session: e-Poster Display Session
90P - The role of miR-133a-3p/SP1/IGF1R axis in the progression of colorectal cancer
Presenter: Hui Li
Session: e-Poster Display Session
91P - Prognostic biomarker of clinical outcome in locally advanced rectal cancer in Chinese patients
Presenter: Sandy Ho
Session: e-Poster Display Session
92P - Development and validation of risk and prognostic nomograms for bone metastases in advanced colorectal cancer patients
Presenter: Nan Wang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
93P - Assessment of nutritional status of colorectal cancer patients in a tertiary government hospital
Presenter: Rogelio Velasco
Session: e-Poster Display Session