Abstract 140P
Background
Preoperative and postoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) levels are related to the prognosis for cancer patients. This study aimed to explore the predictive value of combining the two in gastric cancer (GC) patients.
Methods
Patients in a clinical trial (NCT02327481) from January 2015 to April 2016 were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROCs) were generated. By calculating the areas under the curve (AUC) and the C-index, the discriminative ability of CRP during different periods were compared, including preoperative (pre-CRP), postoperative days 1, 3, and 5 (post-CRPs) and postoperative maximum CRP (post-CRPmax).
Results
Ultimately, 401 patients were included in this study. The median follow-up time was 42 months (range 3-51 months). For postoperative recurrence, the AUC and C-index of pre-CRP were 0.692 and 0.678, respectively, higher than those for post-CRPs, all p<0.05. Among post-CRPs, post-CRPmax had the highest AUC (0.591) and C-index (0.585). The optimal cut-off values for pre-CRP and post-CRPmax were 3.1mg/L and 77.1mg/L, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed both pre-CRP≥3.1mg/L (high-pre-CRP) and post-CRPmax≥77.1mg/L (high-post-CRPmax) were independent factors for recurrence-free survival (RFS). The model consisting of the pre-CRP, post-CRPmax and TNM had higher predictive ability and clinical utility. Adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) benefit analysis for stage II/III GC showed patients with pre-CRP<3.1mg/L did not benefit from chemotherapy (RFS:90.0% nonchemotherapy group vs 80.7% chemotherapy group, p=0.557). In the high-pre-CRP group, only patients with high-post-CRPmax but not post-CRPmax<77.1mg/L benefited from chemotherapy (RFS:33.2% nonchemotherapy group vs 49.9% chemotherapy group, p=0.037). Similar findings were observed for overall survival.
Conclusions
Both pre-CRP and post-CRPmax, inexpensively and easily obtained, are independent predictors of recurrence for GC. ACT significantly prolonged the RFS for stage II/III GC with high-pre-CRP and high-post-CRPmax after R0 resection.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Scientific and Technological Innovation Joint Capital Projects of Fujian Province.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
61P - Clinical implication of BRCA mutation in breast cancer with central nervous system metastasis
Presenter: Jwa Hoon Kim
Session: e-Poster Display Session
62P - IGF axis in breast cancer recurrence and metastasis
Presenter: Hajara Akhter
Session: e-Poster Display Session
63P - Butterfly pea (<italic>Clitoria ternatea</italic> Linn.) flower extract prevents MCF-7 HER2-positive breast cancer cell metastasis in-vitro
Presenter: Azzahra Asysyifa
Session: e-Poster Display Session
64P - Pre-treatment absolute white blood cell profile count as metastatic predictive factors in invasive ductal carcinoma breast cancer
Presenter: Wikania I Gede
Session: e-Poster Display Session
65P - The new mouse anti-nNav1.5 monoclonal antibody
Presenter: Nur Aishah Sharudin
Session: e-Poster Display Session
66P - The TILs near solid structures is a potential prognostic factor of distant metastases in the luminal HER2-negative breast cancer
Presenter: Vladimir Alifanov
Session: e-Poster Display Session
73P - Selinexor in combination with carboplatin and pemetrexed (CP) in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors: Results of an open label, single-center, multi-arm phase Ib study
Presenter: Kyaw Thein
Session: e-Poster Display Session
74P - Comprehensive transcriptome analysis of endoplasmic reticulum stress in osteosarcomas
Presenter: Yoshiyuki Suehara
Session: e-Poster Display Session
75P - The evaluation of selective sensitivity of EZH2 inhibitors based on synthetic lethality in ARID1A-deficient gastric cancer
Presenter: Leo Yamada
Session: e-Poster Display Session
76P - Targeted tumour photoImmunotherapy against triple-negative breast cancer therapy
Presenter: Vivek Raju
Session: e-Poster Display Session