Abstract 187P
Background
Few reports address the impact of surgery on the prognosis of rare and heterogeneous gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma (G-NEC). This study analyzed the influence of surgical treatments on prognosis to provide a personalized surgical treatment strategy for G-NEC patients.
Methods
The clinicopathological data of 964 G-NEC patients from 24 Chinese hospitals were analyzed. Cox regression analyses were used to analyze the prognostic factors affecting survival and recurrence, respectively.
Results
Cox analysis revealed that in stage I-II but not stage III gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma/mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC/MANEC) patients, D2 (extended) lymph node dissection (ELND) was an independent protective factor for OS and DFS (p<0.05; p<0.05). In stage I-II, 3-year OS and DFS increased with more of LNs dissected (p<0.05), while in stage III patients undergoing ELND, the 3-year OS and DFS was similar to patients undergoing D1+ (limited) lymph node dissection (LLND) (p>0.05). Furthermore, among patients with stage III disease, the incidence of complications after ELND was significantly greater than that after LLND (28.4% vs. 12.1%, p < 0.001), especially severe complications (Clavien-Dindo grade III-V). For patients with stage I-II disease, ELLN not only brings lower overall recurrence rate (ELND vs. LLND = 16.9% vs 27.6%, p = 0.018) but also reduced the risk of regional LN and distant LN recurrence (all p < 0.05).
Conclusions
ELND may lead to enhanced long-term survival for stage I and II but not stage III NEC/MANEC patients. Our results in multicenter patients do not support the routine use of ELND in stage III NEC/MANEC patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Scientific and Technological Innovation Joint Capital Projects of Fujian Province.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
211P - The impact of low muscle mass to overall survival in bladder cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Karunia Japar
Session: e-Poster Display Session
212P - Stage I non-seminoma testicular cancer: Adjuvant management and outcomes
Presenter: Gaik Tin Quah
Session: e-Poster Display Session
213P - Stage I seminoma testicular cancer: Predictors of relapse and outcomes for adjuvant carboplatin vs active surveillance
Presenter: Gaik Tin Quah
Session: e-Poster Display Session
214P - Study of treatment outcome in adults with TFE related RCC
Presenter: Ajaykumar Singh
Session: e-Poster Display Session
215P - Analysis of spatial heterogeneity of responses in metastatic sites with nivolumab in renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Venkata Pradeep Babu Koyyala
Session: e-Poster Display Session
216P - Clinical profile and treatment outcome of testicular seminoma treated at tertiary care centre in Chennai
Presenter: Sivasubramaniam Kumaravelu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
220P - A cost-effectiveness analysis of systemic therapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer
Presenter: Winnie Sung
Session: e-Poster Display Session
221P - Patient-reported sexual and urinary function in nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) when treated with apalutamide (APA) vs placebo (PBO) and ongoing androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in SPARTAN
Presenter: Hiroji Uemura
Session: e-Poster Display Session
222P - Tolerability and treatment response to darolutamide (DARO) in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) in the phase III ARAMIS trial
Presenter: Matthew R. Smith
Session: e-Poster Display Session
223P - Overall survival (OS) results of phase III ARAMIS study of darolutamide (DARO) added to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC)
Presenter: Karim Fizazi
Session: e-Poster Display Session