Abstract 309P
Background
The American College of radiology proposed BI-RADS lexicon lacks defined rules which direct conversion of specific imaging features into a diagnostic category, results in a discrepancy of reporting. This study compares results from multilayer Perceptron neural network and a classification tree.
Methods
A total of 316 lesions with successive histological verification (221 malignant, 95 benign) were investigated. Six lesion criteria's were assessed by 2 readers in consensus. Classification analysis was performed using the chi-squared automatic interaction detection (CHAID) method. Results include the probability for malignancy for every descriptor combination in the classification tree. Simultaneously a multilayer Perceptron neural network was developed by using SPSS software.
Results
A classification tree incorporating 6 lesion descriptors with a depth of 4 ramifications (1- ADC values; 2 -root sign; 3- enhancement pattern; 4 - oedema) was calculated. Of all 316 lesions, 38 (40 %) and 212 (95.9 %) could be classified as benign and malignant with an accuracy above 95 %, respectively. Overall diagnostic accuracy was 79.1 %. The multilayer perceptron network segregated the lesions into training and testing sets in a ratio of 7:3. With a hyperbolic tangent activation function, there were six units of hidden layer and the model show a 20% and 17% incorrect predictions in the training in the testing sets. The diagnostic accuracy of malignant and benign lesions was 92% and 52 % in both the training and testing sets. The area under the curve of the ROC was .855. The order of importance of synaptic weights calculated from the model were ADC ( 0.257), Internal enhancement (0.233), ROOT SIGN (0.175), Margins (0.138), Curve type (0.138), edema (0.038) and mass / non mass (0.021).
Conclusions
The classification algorithm correctly classified 95 % malignant lesions with accuracy above 95 %. The neural network model showed good results on internal validation and revealed ADC to be the most significant parameter with the least importance to morphological classification into mass and non-mass lesions. Also, the dynamic contrast curve patterns were more significant than margins.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Center.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
183P - Textbook outcome as a measure of surgical quality assessment and prognosis in gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma: A large multicenter sample analysis
Presenter: You-Xin Gao
Session: e-Poster Display Session
184P - Development and external validation of a nomogram to predict recurrence-free survival after R0 resection for stage II/III gastric adenocarcinoma: An international multicenter study
Presenter: Bin-Bin Xu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
185P - Effect of sarcopenia on short- and long-term outcomes of patients with gastric neuroendocrine tumour after radical surgery: Results from a large, two-institutional series
Presenter: Ling-Qian Wang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
186P - Characterization of the gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumour patient journey
Presenter: George Fisher Jr
Session: e-Poster Display Session
187P - More is not always better: A multicenter study in lymphadenectomy during gastrectomy for gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma
Presenter: Qi-Yue Chen
Session: e-Poster Display Session
188P - The impact of sarcopenia on chemotherapy toxicity and survival rate among pancreatic cancer patients who underwent chemotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Billy Susanto
Session: e-Poster Display Session
189P - Prognostic value of inflammation-based score for patients treated with FOLFIRINOX (FFX) or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP)
Presenter: Takahiro Yamamura
Session: e-Poster Display Session
190P - Outcomes from the Asian region of the phase III APACT trial of adjuvant nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (nab-P/G) vs gemcitabine (G) alone for patients (pts) with resected pancreatic cancer (PC)
Presenter: Joon Oh Park
Session: e-Poster Display Session
191P - First-line liposomal irinotecan + 5 fluorouracil/leucovorin + oxaliplatin in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Results from a phase I/II study
Presenter: Andrew Dean
Session: e-Poster Display Session
192P - A multicenter crossover analysis of first and second-line FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel administered to pancreatic cancer patients: Results from the NAPOLEON study
Presenter: Kenta Nio
Session: e-Poster Display Session