Abstract 309P
Background
The American College of radiology proposed BI-RADS lexicon lacks defined rules which direct conversion of specific imaging features into a diagnostic category, results in a discrepancy of reporting. This study compares results from multilayer Perceptron neural network and a classification tree.
Methods
A total of 316 lesions with successive histological verification (221 malignant, 95 benign) were investigated. Six lesion criteria's were assessed by 2 readers in consensus. Classification analysis was performed using the chi-squared automatic interaction detection (CHAID) method. Results include the probability for malignancy for every descriptor combination in the classification tree. Simultaneously a multilayer Perceptron neural network was developed by using SPSS software.
Results
A classification tree incorporating 6 lesion descriptors with a depth of 4 ramifications (1- ADC values; 2 -root sign; 3- enhancement pattern; 4 - oedema) was calculated. Of all 316 lesions, 38 (40 %) and 212 (95.9 %) could be classified as benign and malignant with an accuracy above 95 %, respectively. Overall diagnostic accuracy was 79.1 %. The multilayer perceptron network segregated the lesions into training and testing sets in a ratio of 7:3. With a hyperbolic tangent activation function, there were six units of hidden layer and the model show a 20% and 17% incorrect predictions in the training in the testing sets. The diagnostic accuracy of malignant and benign lesions was 92% and 52 % in both the training and testing sets. The area under the curve of the ROC was .855. The order of importance of synaptic weights calculated from the model were ADC ( 0.257), Internal enhancement (0.233), ROOT SIGN (0.175), Margins (0.138), Curve type (0.138), edema (0.038) and mass / non mass (0.021).
Conclusions
The classification algorithm correctly classified 95 % malignant lesions with accuracy above 95 %. The neural network model showed good results on internal validation and revealed ADC to be the most significant parameter with the least importance to morphological classification into mass and non-mass lesions. Also, the dynamic contrast curve patterns were more significant than margins.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Center.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
153P - Mutational landscape of gastric cancer (GC) in adolescents and young adults (AYA) in Asia from 2015-2019
Presenter: Evelyn Yi Ting Wong
Session: e-Poster Display Session
154P - A multicenter, prospective study of apatinib plus chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer
Presenter: Yi-Hui Tang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
155P - Surgical outcomes and technical performance of robotic versus laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A prospective comparative study FUGES-014
Presenter: Hua-Gen Wang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
156P - Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy during total gastrectomy for advanced proximal gastric cancer: A randomized clinical trial
Presenter: Jian-Xian Lin
Session: e-Poster Display Session
157P - Efficacy and safety of penpulimab (AK105), a new generation anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) antibody, in upper gastrointestinal cancers
Presenter: Amy Prawira
Session: e-Poster Display Session
158P - A phase II study of trastuzumab with S-1 plus oxaliplatin for HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer (HIGHSOX study): Final report
Presenter: Atsuo Takashima
Session: e-Poster Display Session
159P - Open surgery can improve the 3-year postoperative survival in some patients with advanced gastric cancer compared with laparoscopic surgery: A multicenter, propensity score matching, in-depth analysis
Presenter: Ze-Ning Huang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
160P - Phase II study of sintilimab combined with FLOT regimen for neoadjuvant treatment of gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Ning Li
Session: e-Poster Display Session
161P - Adjuvant tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil (S-1) versus platinum-based chemotherapies for resectable gastric cancer: Real-world experience and a propensity score matching analysis
Presenter: Chih Chieh Yen
Session: e-Poster Display Session
162P - Evaluation of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in monitoring anastomotic leakage after radical total gastrectomy for gastric cancer
Presenter: Ru-Hong Tu
Session: e-Poster Display Session