Abstract 246P
Background
C-reactive protein (CRP) is the inflammation-responsible protein and a significant rise of the plasma concentration of CRP is pervasive in the progress of ovarian cancer. However, there are few studies that comprehensively evaluate the correlation between CRP concentrations and ovarian cancer and the causal effect remains unknown. With a Mendelian randomization (MR) approach, we were able to investigate the causal relationship between genetically predicted CRP levels and ovarian cancer risk.
Methods
Utilizing 32 CRP-related single nucleotide polymorphisms as instrumental variables identified by the latest genome-wide association studies, we investigated the correlation between genetically predicted CRP and ovarian cancer risk using summary statistics from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (25,509 cases and 40,941 controls). The Inverse variance weighted (IVW) method was applied to estimate the causality between genetically elevated CRP concentrations and ovarian cancer risk. To further evaluate the pleiotropy, the weighted median and the MR-Egger regression method were implemented. Subgroup analyses according to different histotypes of ovarian cancer were also conducted.
Results
An inverse association was observed between genetically predicted one-unit increase in the log-transformed CRP concentrations and ovarian cancer (OR = 0.93, 95%CI = 0.87-1.00 p = 0.047). When results were examined by histotypes, an inverse association was observed between genetically predicted one-unit increase in the log-transformed CRP concentrations and endometrioid ovarian cancer (OR = 0.80, 95%CI = 0.70-0.91 p = 0.001), low-grade serous ovarian cancer (OR = 0.70, 95%CI = 0.58-0.86 p = 0.001) and serous ovarian cancer (OR = 0.84, 95%CI = 0.74-0.96 p = 0.012). Additionally, the results demonstrated the absence of the horizontal pleiotropy.
Conclusions
MR findings provide evidence for a causal relationship between genetically predicted one-unit increase in the log-transformed CRP concentrations and reduced ovarian cancer risk, overall and among specific histotypes. Further studies are warranted to investigate the underlying mechanism.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Resources from the same session
24P - The Pink Vans: Bringing cancer screening closer to home
Presenter: Frederic Ivan Ting
Session: e-Poster Display Session
25P - Identification of gene mutations in patients with breast cancer in a region located in the southeast of the European part of Russia
Presenter: Alexander Sultanbaev
Session: e-Poster Display Session
26P - Body mass index and clinical outcomes in Egyptian women with breast cancer: A multi-institutional study
Presenter: Amrou Mamdouh Abdeen Shaaban
Session: e-Poster Display Session
27P - Breast cancer primary site and laterality as predictive factors of prognosis: SEER based analysis for survival
Presenter: Eman Zin Eldin
Session: e-Poster Display Session
28P - Breast cancer care services at Nilai Medical Centre: A Malaysian experience
Presenter: Ratnavelu Kananathan
Session: e-Poster Display Session
29P - Factors affecting breast self-examination (BSE) behaviour among female high school students in Denpasar City, Bali
Presenter: Cindy Trisina
Session: e-Poster Display Session
30P - Male breast cancer: A rural based peripheral cancer center experience
Presenter: SACHIN KHANDELWAL
Session: e-Poster Display Session
31P - The prognostic value of pre-treatment peripheral neutrophil-lymphocyte-ratio (NLR) and its correlation with mutant p53 expression in Indonesian triple negative breast cancer patients
Presenter: Rosita Purwanto
Session: e-Poster Display Session
32P - Clinicopathologic features and prognostic factors in male breast cancer: A single centre experience
Presenter: Izzet Dogan
Session: e-Poster Display Session
33P - FDG-PET predictivity of pathological axillary nodal status in carcinoma breast-upfront and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) setting
Presenter: Krithikaa Sekar
Session: e-Poster Display Session