Abstract 410P
Background
Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) have been recognized as the most important predictor of response to crizotinib. However, 20-30% of patients harboring ALK fusion non-small-cell lung cancer patients show a poor response requiring investigation for underlying mechanisms.
Methods
We screened 3207 patients with NSCLC for ALK fusion. Among them, 92 patients received crizotinib treatment,and a total of 81 patients with stage IIIb-IV ALK+NSCLC were undergoing tumor biopsies or blood withdrawing by the time of primary or acquiring resistance to crizotinib, including 43 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples, 25 serum samples and 24 serous effusions. We used targeted NGS to detect genes status of patients.
Results
Among 92 patients treated with crizotinib, 76.09% (70/92) developed acquired resistance, and 11.96% (11/92) had primary resistance. Using the specimens at the baseline, there were 2 (18.18%) patients with BCL2L11 loss (BIM deletion polymorphism), 1 (9.09%) patient with PTEN mutation, 1 (9.09%) patient with PIK3CA mutation, 1 (9.09%) patient with CCND1 mutation, 1 (9.09%) patient with SMARCA4 mutation, 1 (9.09%) patient with CMTR1-ALK, 1 (9.09%) patient with EML4-ALK fusion (non A20), and 3 (27.27%) patients with unknown status.
Conclusions
BCL2L11 loss, PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling pathway (PTEN, PIK3CA mutations), SMARCA4 mutations or EML4-ALK fusion (non A20) might contribute to molecular mechanisms of primary resistance to crizotinib in ALK+NSCLC.Further investigations are warranted to overcome these primary resistance.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Chun-wei Xu.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
104P - Safety and efficacy of HLX04 versus reference bevacizumab in combination with XELOX or mFOLFOX6 as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: A randomised, double-blind phase III study
Presenter: Shukui Qin
Session: e-Poster Display Session
105P - Prospective, open-label, observational study of cetuximab for metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC): The OPTIM1SE study
Presenter: Tsai-Sheng Yang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
106P - Efficacy and tolerability of capecitabine and mitomycin-C based concurrent radiotherapy in patients with anal canal cancer
Presenter: Prabhat Bhargava
Session: e-Poster Display Session
107P - Safety and efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) in previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Results from the Australian cohort of the phase IIIb, international, open-label, early-access PRECONNECT study
Presenter: Timothy Price
Session: e-Poster Display Session
108P - Comparative analysis of two-stage hepatectomy and enhanced one-stage hepatectomy in the setting of bilobar colorectal liver metastases
Presenter: Hayk Torgomyan
Session: e-Poster Display Session
109P - Efficacy and safety of biweekly or triweekly XELOX regimen for adjuvant chemotherapy of colorectal cancer
Presenter: hangyu zhang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
110P - Analysis for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) effect for colorectal liver metastases
Presenter: Wei Zou
Session: e-Poster Display Session
111P - A meta-analysis study on safety and effectiveness comparison between FOLFOX and XELOX regiments on advanced stage colorectal cancer
Presenter: Ida Bagus Budhi
Session: e-Poster Display Session
112P - Pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy in patients with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair deficient metastatic colorectal cancer: Asia subgroup results of the phase III KEYNOTE-177 study
Presenter: Takayuki Yoshino
Session: e-Poster Display Session
122P - Nomogram to predict short-term effect of radiotherapy based on pre/post-treatment inflammatory biomarkers and their dynamic changes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Presenter: Shuai Liang
Session: e-Poster Display Session