Abstract 404P
Background
Patients with advanced lung cancer are considered to have a poor prognosis, and recent studies have shown that immunotherapy appears to be associated with improved prognosis and prolonged survival significantly compared with chemotherapy. However, immunotherapy may refer to a comparatively high medical cost and bring severe financial toxicity to patients. In the treatment course of patients with advanced lung cancer, much attention was paid to the safety and efficacy of medications, rather than financial toxicity, which may affect the prognosis and survival indeed. In that case, it is necessary to weigh the profit and the financial toxicity led by immunotherapy.
Methods
We performed a systematic search in Medline on the cost-effectiveness of immunotherapy in patients with advanced lung cancer, and 16 studies were included, consisting of 6 countries, We systematically reviewed the incremental cost for improved quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in patients treated with immunotherapy with respect to different countries and different tumor proportion score (TPS) of programmed death receptor-1 ligand (PD-L1).
Results
We found that the willingness to pay (WTP) was not significantly associated with ICER among three western countries (P=0.354). Patients with TPS ≥50%, ≥20%, or ≥1% showed no significant differences in elevated QALYs (P=0.148) and ICER (P=0.263). The elevated QALYs (P=0.024) and ICER of Pembrolizumab were significantly higher than that of Atezolizumab (P=0.045), while there was no significant difference in the cost of elevated QALY between Pembrolizumab and Atezolizumab (P=0.747).
Conclusions
Patients with advanced lung cancer would get profit in the treatment of immunotherapy from different countries, while Pembrolizumab would be associated with a higher benefit and less financial toxicity when taking cost-effectiveness analysis into account. Thus, patients would get more in the immunotherapy when financial toxicity was taken into consideration, and it is necessary to integrate financial toxicity in the clinical decision.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
173P - Regorafenib in patients (pts) with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) in real-world practice in Asia: Interim results from the observational REFINE study
Presenter: Ho Yeong Lim
Session: e-Poster Display Session
174P - A real-world study of PD-1 inhibitors combined with TKIs for HCC with major vascular invasion as the conversion therapy: A prospective, non-randomized, open-label cohort study
Presenter: Wenwen Zhang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
175P - A study of neoadjuvant sintilimab combined with triplet chemotherapy of lipo-paclitaxel, cisplatin, and S-1 for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)
Presenter: Yanhong Gu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
177P - Organ specific tumour response to first-line (1L) therapy with combined lenvatinib (LEN) and anti-PD-1 antibodies in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)
Presenter: Hui-Chuan Sun
Session: e-Poster Display Session
178P - Real-world efficacy and safety of lenvatinib in Korean patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter retrospective analysis
Presenter: Jaekyung Cheon
Session: e-Poster Display Session
179P - Regorafenib combined with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with previous systematic treatment: A preliminary investigation of safety and efficacy
Presenter: Yue Han
Session: e-Poster Display Session
180P - Real-world (RW) treatment (tx) patterns and outcomes in patients (pts) from Taiwan and Singapore with intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)
Presenter: Su Pin Choo
Session: e-Poster Display Session
181P - Evaluation of first-line systemic treatments for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC): A network meta-analysis
Presenter: Weihua Zhi
Session: e-Poster Display Session
182P - Lenvatinib (LEN) plus anti-PD-1 antibodies vs LEN alone for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): A real-world study
Presenter: Qi Li
Session: e-Poster Display Session