Abstract 404P
Background
Patients with advanced lung cancer are considered to have a poor prognosis, and recent studies have shown that immunotherapy appears to be associated with improved prognosis and prolonged survival significantly compared with chemotherapy. However, immunotherapy may refer to a comparatively high medical cost and bring severe financial toxicity to patients. In the treatment course of patients with advanced lung cancer, much attention was paid to the safety and efficacy of medications, rather than financial toxicity, which may affect the prognosis and survival indeed. In that case, it is necessary to weigh the profit and the financial toxicity led by immunotherapy.
Methods
We performed a systematic search in Medline on the cost-effectiveness of immunotherapy in patients with advanced lung cancer, and 16 studies were included, consisting of 6 countries, We systematically reviewed the incremental cost for improved quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in patients treated with immunotherapy with respect to different countries and different tumor proportion score (TPS) of programmed death receptor-1 ligand (PD-L1).
Results
We found that the willingness to pay (WTP) was not significantly associated with ICER among three western countries (P=0.354). Patients with TPS ≥50%, ≥20%, or ≥1% showed no significant differences in elevated QALYs (P=0.148) and ICER (P=0.263). The elevated QALYs (P=0.024) and ICER of Pembrolizumab were significantly higher than that of Atezolizumab (P=0.045), while there was no significant difference in the cost of elevated QALY between Pembrolizumab and Atezolizumab (P=0.747).
Conclusions
Patients with advanced lung cancer would get profit in the treatment of immunotherapy from different countries, while Pembrolizumab would be associated with a higher benefit and less financial toxicity when taking cost-effectiveness analysis into account. Thus, patients would get more in the immunotherapy when financial toxicity was taken into consideration, and it is necessary to integrate financial toxicity in the clinical decision.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
163P - Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) in adolescents and young adults (AYA) in an Asian institution from 2002 to 2018
Presenter: Evelyn Yi Ting Wong
Session: e-Poster Display Session
164P - The impact of sarcopenia on chemotherapy toxicity and survival rate among hepatocellular carcinoma patients who underwent chemotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Elizabeth Marcella
Session: e-Poster Display Session
165P - Prognostic factors in sorafenib-treated hepatocellular carcinoma: Multicentre analysis of a European population sample
Presenter: João Gramaça
Session: e-Poster Display Session
166P - Differences and similarities in presentation and management patterns in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) across Hong Kong, Singapore and Thailand
Presenter: Pierce Chow
Session: e-Poster Display Session
167P - Epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in tertiary level hospitals in Bangladesh
Presenter: Abdullah Al Mamun Khan
Session: e-Poster Display Session
168P - Response assessments in hepatocellular carcinoma: What are the best criteria to utilize? mRECIST or RECIST 1.1? A retrospective meta-analysis of multiple phase III trials
Presenter: Oliver Bohnsack
Session: e-Poster Display Session
169P - IMbrave150: Management of adverse events of special interest (AESIs) for atezolizumab (atezo) and bevacizumab (bev) in unresectable HCC
Presenter: Masatoshi Kudo
Session: e-Poster Display Session
170P - Sintilimab plus anlotinib as first-line therapy in patients (pts) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC)
Presenter: Xiaofeng Chen
Session: e-Poster Display Session
171P - Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus lenvatinib versus TACE plus sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumour thrombus (PVTT): A prospective randomized study
Presenter: Xiaoyan Ding
Session: e-Poster Display Session
172P - Triple combination therapy of lenvatinib, toripalimab, and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy versus lenvatinib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
Presenter: Zhi-Cheng Lai
Session: e-Poster Display Session