Abstract 409P
Background
Chemotherapy is the basic treatments for lung cancer, and nausea and vomiting is one of the most common adverse event of chemotherapy, which decrease the life quality. As a result, how to prevent chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting(CINV) is an important subject faced by oncologists. The granisetron transdermal delivery system (GTDS) has been developed to deliver granisetron continuously over 7 days to prevent CINV. Some previous cases receiving multiday highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) regimens showed that the GTDS plus dexamethasone was not inferior to the GTDS plus dexamethasone and aprepitant. But there is no similar studies at home and abroad.
Methods
Our study prospectively assessed the non-inferiority of the GTDS plus dexamethasone to the GTDS plus dexamethasone and aprepitant in patients receiving multiday HEC. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with complete control of CINV from chemotherapy initiation until 24 h after final administration. The study has already enrolled 40 patients, 21 patients with two regimens, and 19 patients with three regimens before receiving multiday HEC.
Results
Between January 2019 and June 2020, 40 patients was recruited in the analysis. The GTDS plus dexamethasone group displayed non-inferiority to The GTDS plus dexamethasone and aprepitant group, complete control was achieved by 63.6% of patients in the two regimens group, and 65.4% in the three regimens group (P>0.05). Both treatments were well tolerated, the most common adverse events are manageable.
Conclusions
Current guidelines for the management of multiday HEC recommend three regimens therapy. Our study indicate that the two regimens therapy provides effective, well-tolerated control of multiday HEC. It offers a alternative route for delivering two regimens for up to 7 days that is as effective as three regimens.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
24P - The Pink Vans: Bringing cancer screening closer to home
Presenter: Frederic Ivan Ting
Session: e-Poster Display Session
25P - Identification of gene mutations in patients with breast cancer in a region located in the southeast of the European part of Russia
Presenter: Alexander Sultanbaev
Session: e-Poster Display Session
26P - Body mass index and clinical outcomes in Egyptian women with breast cancer: A multi-institutional study
Presenter: Amrou Mamdouh Abdeen Shaaban
Session: e-Poster Display Session
27P - Breast cancer primary site and laterality as predictive factors of prognosis: SEER based analysis for survival
Presenter: Eman Zin Eldin
Session: e-Poster Display Session
28P - Breast cancer care services at Nilai Medical Centre: A Malaysian experience
Presenter: Ratnavelu Kananathan
Session: e-Poster Display Session
29P - Factors affecting breast self-examination (BSE) behaviour among female high school students in Denpasar City, Bali
Presenter: Cindy Trisina
Session: e-Poster Display Session
30P - Male breast cancer: A rural based peripheral cancer center experience
Presenter: SACHIN KHANDELWAL
Session: e-Poster Display Session
31P - The prognostic value of pre-treatment peripheral neutrophil-lymphocyte-ratio (NLR) and its correlation with mutant p53 expression in Indonesian triple negative breast cancer patients
Presenter: Rosita Purwanto
Session: e-Poster Display Session
32P - Clinicopathologic features and prognostic factors in male breast cancer: A single centre experience
Presenter: Izzet Dogan
Session: e-Poster Display Session
33P - FDG-PET predictivity of pathological axillary nodal status in carcinoma breast-upfront and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) setting
Presenter: Krithikaa Sekar
Session: e-Poster Display Session