Abstract 409P
Background
Chemotherapy is the basic treatments for lung cancer, and nausea and vomiting is one of the most common adverse event of chemotherapy, which decrease the life quality. As a result, how to prevent chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting(CINV) is an important subject faced by oncologists. The granisetron transdermal delivery system (GTDS) has been developed to deliver granisetron continuously over 7 days to prevent CINV. Some previous cases receiving multiday highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) regimens showed that the GTDS plus dexamethasone was not inferior to the GTDS plus dexamethasone and aprepitant. But there is no similar studies at home and abroad.
Methods
Our study prospectively assessed the non-inferiority of the GTDS plus dexamethasone to the GTDS plus dexamethasone and aprepitant in patients receiving multiday HEC. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with complete control of CINV from chemotherapy initiation until 24 h after final administration. The study has already enrolled 40 patients, 21 patients with two regimens, and 19 patients with three regimens before receiving multiday HEC.
Results
Between January 2019 and June 2020, 40 patients was recruited in the analysis. The GTDS plus dexamethasone group displayed non-inferiority to The GTDS plus dexamethasone and aprepitant group, complete control was achieved by 63.6% of patients in the two regimens group, and 65.4% in the three regimens group (P>0.05). Both treatments were well tolerated, the most common adverse events are manageable.
Conclusions
Current guidelines for the management of multiday HEC recommend three regimens therapy. Our study indicate that the two regimens therapy provides effective, well-tolerated control of multiday HEC. It offers a alternative route for delivering two regimens for up to 7 days that is as effective as three regimens.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
133P - Which patient subgroup needs more attention in early treatment failure? A matched cohort study of treatment failure patterns in locally advanced gastric cancer
Presenter: Dong Wu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
134P - Effect of preoperative tumour under-staging on the long-term survival of patients undergoing radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer
Presenter: Mi Lin
Session: e-Poster Display Session
135P - Significance of lymphatic invasion in the indication for additional gastrectomy after endoscopic treatment
Presenter: Hirohito Fujikawa
Session: e-Poster Display Session
136P - Modified ypTNM staging classification for gastric cancer after neoadjuvant therapy: A multi-institutional study
Presenter: Wen-Wu Qiu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
137P - Clinical utility of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) in resectable gastric cancer (GC)
Presenter: Mikhail Fedyanin
Session: e-Poster Display Session
138P - Prognostic importance of dynamic changes in systemic inflammatory markers for patients with gastric cancer
Presenter: Ying-Qi Huang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
139P - An intraoperative model for predicting survival and deciding therapeutic schedules: A comprehensive analysis of peritoneal metastasis in patients with advanced gastric cancer
Presenter: Zhi-Yu Liu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
140P - Preoperative and postoperative C-reactive protein levels predict recurrence and chemotherapy benefit in gastric cancer
Presenter: Li-Li Shen
Session: e-Poster Display Session
141P - Low expression of CDK5RAP3 and UFM1 indicates poor prognosis in patients with gastric cancer
Presenter: Ning-Zi Lian
Session: e-Poster Display Session
142P - Prognostic analysis of patients with intra-abdominal infectious complications after laparoscopy and open radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A propensity score-matching analysis
Presenter: Si-Jin Que
Session: e-Poster Display Session