Abstract 306P
Background
ALK gene rearrangement occurs in 3-7% of non-Sq-NSCLC. Tumor ALK testing by immunohistochemistry (IHC) is recommended. Next generation sequencing (NGS) and fluorescent-in-situ hybridization are validated for samples with inconclusive IHC staining. NGS testing of plasma ctDNA is non-invasive, allowing diagnosis where tissue is inaccessible, and detection of resistance mutations post-progression. One study has reported clinical utility of ALK testing using NGS on plasma, but data are otherwise limited to small samples. We assessed clinical utility of ctDNA NGS for ALK testing for non-Sq-NSCLC in Asia.
Methods
Between September 2015 to May 2020, 464 plasma specimens from 413 patients were analyzed. ctDNA was genotyped using Guardant360 (Guardant Health, Redwood City CA USA). Data on clinicopathologic features and treatment status were extracted from database (Sanomics Ltd, Hong Kong).
Results
ALK fusion and/or resistance mutations were detected in ctDNA of 24 (6%) non-Sq-NSCLC patients. 12 patients (50%) were male. 19 (79%) were adenocarcinoma, 5 (21%) were unknown. Tumor ALK status was available in 21 patients: 13 were ALK positive, 8 previously tested negative. ALK fusion partners included EML4 (85.7%), STRN (9.5%), and KIF5B (4.8%). ALK resistance mutations were detected only in patients with prior ALK inhibitor treatment (8/12, 67%). 13 types of resistance mutations were identified: G1202R, then L1196M, were the most frequent. (Table) Table: 306P
Patient no. | 1a | 1b | 2a | 2b | 3a | 3b | 3c | 4a | 4b | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | |
Prior TKI treatment | NA | Y | NA | NA | Y | Y | Y | O | O | NA | O | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | O | Y | NA | Y | O | Y | NA | O | O | |
ALK TKI | Crizotinib | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | NA | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Ceritinib | Y | Y | Y | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alectinib | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | ||||||||||||||||||||
Lorlatinib | Y | Y | Y | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ALK fusion | EML4-ALK | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | ||||||||||
KIF5B-ALK | P | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
STRN-ALK | P | P | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ALK resistance mutation | E1210K | P | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
D1203N | P | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
F1174C | P | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
F1174L | P | P | P | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
G1202R | P | P | P | P | P | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
G1269A | P | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I1171N | P | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I1171T | P | P | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
L1152R | P | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
L1196M | P | P | P | P | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
L1196Q | P | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
L1198F | P | P | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
V1180L | P | P |
NOTE: TKI - tyrosine kinase inhibitor; a, b, c - 1st, 2nd, 3rd ctDNA NGS test; NA - not available; Y - yes; N - no; O - other therapy; P - positive.
Conclusions
NGS testing for ALK fusions and genomic alterations in plasma ctDNA has clinical utility in non-Sq-NSCLC patients in guiding ALK targeted treatment at initial diagnosis and upon cancer progression. Detection rate and distribution of ALK fusion partners are comparable to existing data of tumor ALK testing. Further data on ALK treatment outcomes of patients with detectable ALK fusion on plasma ctDNA is warranted.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Sanomics Limited.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
K.W.C. Lee, S.T. Wu, P.Y. Lo, C.T. Choy, T.C. Kwong, Y.T.N. Lau. L. Lin, S.W. Lau: Full/Part-time employment: Sanomics Limited.
Resources from the same session
24P - The Pink Vans: Bringing cancer screening closer to home
Presenter: Frederic Ivan Ting
Session: e-Poster Display Session
25P - Identification of gene mutations in patients with breast cancer in a region located in the southeast of the European part of Russia
Presenter: Alexander Sultanbaev
Session: e-Poster Display Session
26P - Body mass index and clinical outcomes in Egyptian women with breast cancer: A multi-institutional study
Presenter: Amrou Mamdouh Abdeen Shaaban
Session: e-Poster Display Session
27P - Breast cancer primary site and laterality as predictive factors of prognosis: SEER based analysis for survival
Presenter: Eman Zin Eldin
Session: e-Poster Display Session
28P - Breast cancer care services at Nilai Medical Centre: A Malaysian experience
Presenter: Ratnavelu Kananathan
Session: e-Poster Display Session
29P - Factors affecting breast self-examination (BSE) behaviour among female high school students in Denpasar City, Bali
Presenter: Cindy Trisina
Session: e-Poster Display Session
30P - Male breast cancer: A rural based peripheral cancer center experience
Presenter: SACHIN KHANDELWAL
Session: e-Poster Display Session
31P - The prognostic value of pre-treatment peripheral neutrophil-lymphocyte-ratio (NLR) and its correlation with mutant p53 expression in Indonesian triple negative breast cancer patients
Presenter: Rosita Purwanto
Session: e-Poster Display Session
32P - Clinicopathologic features and prognostic factors in male breast cancer: A single centre experience
Presenter: Izzet Dogan
Session: e-Poster Display Session
33P - FDG-PET predictivity of pathological axillary nodal status in carcinoma breast-upfront and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) setting
Presenter: Krithikaa Sekar
Session: e-Poster Display Session