Abstract 306P
Background
ALK gene rearrangement occurs in 3-7% of non-Sq-NSCLC. Tumor ALK testing by immunohistochemistry (IHC) is recommended. Next generation sequencing (NGS) and fluorescent-in-situ hybridization are validated for samples with inconclusive IHC staining. NGS testing of plasma ctDNA is non-invasive, allowing diagnosis where tissue is inaccessible, and detection of resistance mutations post-progression. One study has reported clinical utility of ALK testing using NGS on plasma, but data are otherwise limited to small samples. We assessed clinical utility of ctDNA NGS for ALK testing for non-Sq-NSCLC in Asia.
Methods
Between September 2015 to May 2020, 464 plasma specimens from 413 patients were analyzed. ctDNA was genotyped using Guardant360 (Guardant Health, Redwood City CA USA). Data on clinicopathologic features and treatment status were extracted from database (Sanomics Ltd, Hong Kong).
Results
ALK fusion and/or resistance mutations were detected in ctDNA of 24 (6%) non-Sq-NSCLC patients. 12 patients (50%) were male. 19 (79%) were adenocarcinoma, 5 (21%) were unknown. Tumor ALK status was available in 21 patients: 13 were ALK positive, 8 previously tested negative. ALK fusion partners included EML4 (85.7%), STRN (9.5%), and KIF5B (4.8%). ALK resistance mutations were detected only in patients with prior ALK inhibitor treatment (8/12, 67%). 13 types of resistance mutations were identified: G1202R, then L1196M, were the most frequent. (Table) Table: 306P
Patient no. | 1a | 1b | 2a | 2b | 3a | 3b | 3c | 4a | 4b | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | |
Prior TKI treatment | NA | Y | NA | NA | Y | Y | Y | O | O | NA | O | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | O | Y | NA | Y | O | Y | NA | O | O | |
ALK TKI | Crizotinib | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | NA | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Ceritinib | Y | Y | Y | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alectinib | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | ||||||||||||||||||||
Lorlatinib | Y | Y | Y | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ALK fusion | EML4-ALK | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | ||||||||||
KIF5B-ALK | P | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
STRN-ALK | P | P | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ALK resistance mutation | E1210K | P | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
D1203N | P | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
F1174C | P | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
F1174L | P | P | P | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
G1202R | P | P | P | P | P | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
G1269A | P | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I1171N | P | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I1171T | P | P | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
L1152R | P | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
L1196M | P | P | P | P | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
L1196Q | P | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
L1198F | P | P | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
V1180L | P | P |
NOTE: TKI - tyrosine kinase inhibitor; a, b, c - 1st, 2nd, 3rd ctDNA NGS test; NA - not available; Y - yes; N - no; O - other therapy; P - positive.
Conclusions
NGS testing for ALK fusions and genomic alterations in plasma ctDNA has clinical utility in non-Sq-NSCLC patients in guiding ALK targeted treatment at initial diagnosis and upon cancer progression. Detection rate and distribution of ALK fusion partners are comparable to existing data of tumor ALK testing. Further data on ALK treatment outcomes of patients with detectable ALK fusion on plasma ctDNA is warranted.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Sanomics Limited.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
K.W.C. Lee, S.T. Wu, P.Y. Lo, C.T. Choy, T.C. Kwong, Y.T.N. Lau. L. Lin, S.W. Lau: Full/Part-time employment: Sanomics Limited.
Resources from the same session
104P - Safety and efficacy of HLX04 versus reference bevacizumab in combination with XELOX or mFOLFOX6 as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: A randomised, double-blind phase III study
Presenter: Shukui Qin
Session: e-Poster Display Session
105P - Prospective, open-label, observational study of cetuximab for metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC): The OPTIM1SE study
Presenter: Tsai-Sheng Yang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
106P - Efficacy and tolerability of capecitabine and mitomycin-C based concurrent radiotherapy in patients with anal canal cancer
Presenter: Prabhat Bhargava
Session: e-Poster Display Session
107P - Safety and efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) in previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Results from the Australian cohort of the phase IIIb, international, open-label, early-access PRECONNECT study
Presenter: Timothy Price
Session: e-Poster Display Session
108P - Comparative analysis of two-stage hepatectomy and enhanced one-stage hepatectomy in the setting of bilobar colorectal liver metastases
Presenter: Hayk Torgomyan
Session: e-Poster Display Session
109P - Efficacy and safety of biweekly or triweekly XELOX regimen for adjuvant chemotherapy of colorectal cancer
Presenter: hangyu zhang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
110P - Analysis for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) effect for colorectal liver metastases
Presenter: Wei Zou
Session: e-Poster Display Session
111P - A meta-analysis study on safety and effectiveness comparison between FOLFOX and XELOX regiments on advanced stage colorectal cancer
Presenter: Ida Bagus Budhi
Session: e-Poster Display Session
112P - Pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy in patients with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair deficient metastatic colorectal cancer: Asia subgroup results of the phase III KEYNOTE-177 study
Presenter: Takayuki Yoshino
Session: e-Poster Display Session
122P - Nomogram to predict short-term effect of radiotherapy based on pre/post-treatment inflammatory biomarkers and their dynamic changes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Presenter: Shuai Liang
Session: e-Poster Display Session