Abstract 357P
Background
Programmed cell death/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors have preliminarily shown encouraging results as neoadjuvant setting. No data reported on randomized trials comparing neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy leaving undetermined critical issues for better clinical treatment options.
Methods
We conducted a systemic review of trials involving neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy, performing an indirect comparison meta-analysis of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy upon multiple short-term outcome.
Results
This systematic review and meta-analysis included 10 trials of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and 11 neoadjuvant chemotherapy involving 1755 patients. Patients received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors alone (13.3%; 95%CI, 9.0%-19.3%) had lower objective response rate (ORR) compared to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy (62.5%; 95%CI, 54.4%-70.0%) or chemotherapy (41.6%; 95%CI, 36.8%-46.7%) while neoadjuvant PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy (36.2%; 95%CI, 19.2%-57.6%) achieved elevated complete pathological complete response (pCR) eclipsing PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors alone (10.6%; 95%CI, 6.5%-16.9%) and standard chemotherapy (7.5%; 95%CI, 5.7%-9.8%). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (87.2%; 95%CI, 74.9%-94.0%) has numerically lower R0 resection rate in contrast to neoadjuvant PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors alone (92.7%; 95%CI, 83.4%-97.0%) and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy (91.6%; 95%CI, 84.3%-95.7%). Subgroup analysis showed that increased proportion of stage III patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p=0.025, Spearman r=0.761) may be correlated with lower R0 resection rate while no significant correlation was found in PD-1/PD-L1-based neoadjuvant treatment.
Conclusions
Compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, immunotherapy-based regimens provided superior pathological response along with higher complete resection rate especially for stage III disease. Immunotherapy combined chemotherapy as neoadjuvant setting may be a more preferable clinical option currently.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Wen-zhao Zhong.
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
312P - Identification of neoantigen-specific T cell response and anti-tumour immunity in pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Xiaoxiao Du
Session: e-Poster Display Session
313P - Diagnostic value of micro RNA (miRNA) in renal cell cancer: A meta-analysis and systemic review
Presenter: Jestoni Aranilla
Session: e-Poster Display Session
314P - Comprehensive microbial signatures and genomic profiling in tumour samples using next generation sequencing
Presenter: Mei Qi Yee
Session: e-Poster Display Session
315P - High-penetrance breast and/or ovarian cancer susceptibility genes in Filipinos
Presenter: Frances Victoria Que
Session: e-Poster Display Session
316P - Implementation of Vela Analytics to accelerate comprehensive interpretation and reporting of next-generation sequencing-based oncology testing in clinical diagnostic laboratories
Presenter: Yingnan Yu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
317P - Genomic profiling and molecular pathology of Chinese glioma patients
Presenter: yuanli Zhao
Session: e-Poster Display Session
320P - Psychometric interplay of the perception of the real-life impact of COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional survey of patients with newly diagnosed malignancies
Presenter: Kelvin Bao
Session: e-Poster Display Session
321P - Impact of COVID-19 and lockdown on adherence to treatment schedule among cancer patients
Presenter: Krishnamani Kalpathi
Session: e-Poster Display Session
322P - Challenged faced by cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic
Presenter: mithra Krishnamani
Session: e-Poster Display Session
323P - Oncology care in the Republic of Kazakhstan during COVID-19
Presenter: Dilyara Kaidarova
Session: e-Poster Display Session