Abstract 357P
Background
Programmed cell death/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors have preliminarily shown encouraging results as neoadjuvant setting. No data reported on randomized trials comparing neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy leaving undetermined critical issues for better clinical treatment options.
Methods
We conducted a systemic review of trials involving neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy, performing an indirect comparison meta-analysis of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy upon multiple short-term outcome.
Results
This systematic review and meta-analysis included 10 trials of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and 11 neoadjuvant chemotherapy involving 1755 patients. Patients received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors alone (13.3%; 95%CI, 9.0%-19.3%) had lower objective response rate (ORR) compared to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy (62.5%; 95%CI, 54.4%-70.0%) or chemotherapy (41.6%; 95%CI, 36.8%-46.7%) while neoadjuvant PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy (36.2%; 95%CI, 19.2%-57.6%) achieved elevated complete pathological complete response (pCR) eclipsing PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors alone (10.6%; 95%CI, 6.5%-16.9%) and standard chemotherapy (7.5%; 95%CI, 5.7%-9.8%). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (87.2%; 95%CI, 74.9%-94.0%) has numerically lower R0 resection rate in contrast to neoadjuvant PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors alone (92.7%; 95%CI, 83.4%-97.0%) and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy (91.6%; 95%CI, 84.3%-95.7%). Subgroup analysis showed that increased proportion of stage III patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p=0.025, Spearman r=0.761) may be correlated with lower R0 resection rate while no significant correlation was found in PD-1/PD-L1-based neoadjuvant treatment.
Conclusions
Compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, immunotherapy-based regimens provided superior pathological response along with higher complete resection rate especially for stage III disease. Immunotherapy combined chemotherapy as neoadjuvant setting may be a more preferable clinical option currently.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Wen-zhao Zhong.
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
243P - Target sequencing of 508 genes in Chinese epithelial ovarian cancer patients
Presenter: Li Lei
Session: e-Poster Display Session
244P - Optimization of early diagnostics of cervical intraepitelial neoplasies and cervical cancer
Presenter: Zakhirova Nargiza
Session: e-Poster Display Session
245P - Clinicopathological features including response to platinum-based chemotherapy in endometrial carcinomas involving SWI/SNF complex inactivation.
Presenter: Izumi Tanimoto
Session: e-Poster Display Session
246P - Impact of genetically predicted elevated concentrations of C-reactive protein on ovarian cancer risk: A Mendelian randomization study
Presenter: Haoxin Peng
Session: e-Poster Display Session
247P - The role of p53 gene suppressor and bcl-2 oncoprotein in non-epithelial ovarian tumor prognosis determination among child and adolescent patients
Presenter: Anvar Shukullaev
Session: e-Poster Display Session
248P - The effect of progesterone on ALA-based PDT efficacy in uterine sarcoma cells
Presenter: Ellie Chu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
249P - A Retrospective Study on the Treatment Response of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Patients to Combination Chemoradiotherapy
Presenter: Siti Nabihah Sahralidin
Session: e-Poster Display Session
250P - Health-related Quality of Life in Women with Cervical Cancer
Presenter: Almagul Zhabagina
Session: e-Poster Display Session
251P - Tendency of morbidity and mortality in cervical cancer in the last 10 years in the Republic of Uzbekistan
Presenter: Mirzagaleb Tillyashaykhov
Session: e-Poster Display Session
252P - Secondary data analysis of newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer in South Korea
Presenter: Soo Young Jeong
Session: e-Poster Display Session