Abstract 144P
Background
This study was conducted to evaluate the relation of DNA damage repair (DDR) to clinical outcomes in gastric cancer patients with stage II or III treated gastrectomy.
Methods
From January 2005 to December 2017, 217 patients with stage II or III gastric cancer were analyzed for disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival according to DDR gene status. Immunohistochemical assessment of MLH1, MSH2, ARID1A, PARP-1, BRCA1 and ATM was performed in biologic samples.
Results
Among the 217 patients, the most commonly mutated DDR gene was MSH2 (n = 208, 95.9%), followed by BRCA1 (n = 191, 88.0%), MLH1 (n = 184, 84.8%), ARID1A (n = 170, 78.3%), ATM (n = 146, 67.3%) and PARP-1 (n=120, 55.3%). The high expression levels of PARP-1 group had a significantly longer 5-year OS rate as compared to low expression level of PARP-1 group (62.7% vs. 48.1%, HR 0.649, 95% CI 0.433-0.974, P = 0.035). In the multivariate OS analysis, TNM stage (HR = 5.202, P < 0.001), high expression PARP-1 (HR = 0.583, P = 0.011) and adjuvant chemotherapy (HR = 0.382, P <0.001) were only significantly prognostic factor.
Conclusions
A subgroup of patients with gastric cancer may benefit from targeted therapy. High PARP-1 expression may be a good prognostic factor for gastric cancer particularly, stage II or III gastric cancer post-surgery.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
164P - The impact of sarcopenia on chemotherapy toxicity and survival rate among hepatocellular carcinoma patients who underwent chemotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Elizabeth Marcella
Session: e-Poster Display Session
165P - Prognostic factors in sorafenib-treated hepatocellular carcinoma: Multicentre analysis of a European population sample
Presenter: João Gramaça
Session: e-Poster Display Session
166P - Differences and similarities in presentation and management patterns in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) across Hong Kong, Singapore and Thailand
Presenter: Pierce Chow
Session: e-Poster Display Session
167P - Epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in tertiary level hospitals in Bangladesh
Presenter: Abdullah Al Mamun Khan
Session: e-Poster Display Session
168P - Response assessments in hepatocellular carcinoma: What are the best criteria to utilize? mRECIST or RECIST 1.1? A retrospective meta-analysis of multiple phase III trials
Presenter: Oliver Bohnsack
Session: e-Poster Display Session
169P - IMbrave150: Management of adverse events of special interest (AESIs) for atezolizumab (atezo) and bevacizumab (bev) in unresectable HCC
Presenter: Masatoshi Kudo
Session: e-Poster Display Session
170P - Sintilimab plus anlotinib as first-line therapy in patients (pts) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC)
Presenter: Xiaofeng Chen
Session: e-Poster Display Session
171P - Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus lenvatinib versus TACE plus sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumour thrombus (PVTT): A prospective randomized study
Presenter: Xiaoyan Ding
Session: e-Poster Display Session
172P - Triple combination therapy of lenvatinib, toripalimab, and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy versus lenvatinib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
Presenter: Zhi-Cheng Lai
Session: e-Poster Display Session
173P - Regorafenib in patients (pts) with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) in real-world practice in Asia: Interim results from the observational REFINE study
Presenter: Ho Yeong Lim
Session: e-Poster Display Session