Abstract 147P
Background
In 2017, the 8th edition of the Union for International Cancer Control TNM classification (TNM8) was published and clinical staging system was newly defined. Recently, this clinical staging reportedly predicted the prognosis in patients with gastric cancer (GC). Different from common GC, the diagnosis and the treatment of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) have been controversial. Moreover, its incidence also has increased in Japan. The purpose of this study was to clarify whether the prognosis of patients with Siewert type II/III tumors was appropriately stratified by the clinical staging system.
Methods
Patients who were diagnosed with AEG type II/III and received gastrectomy or esophagectomy between 1986 and 2014 at Kanagawa Cancer Center were included in this study. Patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded.
Results
A total of 196 patients were examined, 123 (63%) patients had type II tumor and 73 (37%) had type III. 41 patients were classified to clinical stage I, 40 were to stage II, 104 were to stage III, and 11 were to stage IV, respectively. The median follow-up period of the survivors was 58.3 months. The 5-year overall survival rate was 48.8 % in whole cohort and were 82.5% in stage I, 70.0% in stage II, 31.7% in stage III, and 9.1% in stage IV. The hazard ratio to stage I was 1.93 in stage II, 5.68 in stage III, and 11.8 in stage IV, which increased in a stepwise manner with the stage.
Conclusions
The clinical staging system of TNM8 could appropriately stratify the prognosis of the patients with Siewert type II/III tumors.
Clinical trial identification
This study was approved by the institutional review board of Kanagawa Cancer Center. (Epidemiological Study-23).
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Kanagawa Cancer Center.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
211P - The impact of low muscle mass to overall survival in bladder cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Karunia Japar
Session: e-Poster Display Session
212P - Stage I non-seminoma testicular cancer: Adjuvant management and outcomes
Presenter: Gaik Tin Quah
Session: e-Poster Display Session
213P - Stage I seminoma testicular cancer: Predictors of relapse and outcomes for adjuvant carboplatin vs active surveillance
Presenter: Gaik Tin Quah
Session: e-Poster Display Session
214P - Study of treatment outcome in adults with TFE related RCC
Presenter: Ajaykumar Singh
Session: e-Poster Display Session
215P - Analysis of spatial heterogeneity of responses in metastatic sites with nivolumab in renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Venkata Pradeep Babu Koyyala
Session: e-Poster Display Session
216P - Clinical profile and treatment outcome of testicular seminoma treated at tertiary care centre in Chennai
Presenter: Sivasubramaniam Kumaravelu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
220P - A cost-effectiveness analysis of systemic therapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer
Presenter: Winnie Sung
Session: e-Poster Display Session
221P - Patient-reported sexual and urinary function in nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) when treated with apalutamide (APA) vs placebo (PBO) and ongoing androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in SPARTAN
Presenter: Hiroji Uemura
Session: e-Poster Display Session
222P - Tolerability and treatment response to darolutamide (DARO) in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) in the phase III ARAMIS trial
Presenter: Matthew R. Smith
Session: e-Poster Display Session
223P - Overall survival (OS) results of phase III ARAMIS study of darolutamide (DARO) added to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC)
Presenter: Karim Fizazi
Session: e-Poster Display Session