Abstract 139P
Background
No specialized prognosis model for gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis (GCPM) exists for intraoperative clinical decision-making. This study aims to establish a new prognostic model to provide individual treatment decisions for GCPM.
Methods
This retrospective analysis included 324 GCPM diagnosed pathologically by laparoscopy from January 2007 to January 2018 who were randomly assigned to different sets (227 in the training set and 97 in the validation set). A nomogram was established from preoperative and intraoperative variables determined by the Cox model. The peritoneal metastasis nomogram (PMN), was compared with the 15th peritoneal metastasis staging system (P1abc) for its predictive ability and clinical applicability.
Results
The median survival time was 8 (range, 1-90) months. In the training set, each PMN substage had significantly different survival curves (P<0.001), and the PMN was superior to P1abc based on the results of time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve, C-index, Akaike information criterion and likelihood ratio chi-square analyses. In the validation set, the PMN was also better than P1abc in terms of its predictive ability. Of the PMN1 patients, those undergoing palliative resection (PR) had better OS than those undergoing exploratory surgery (ES) (P<0.05). Among the patients undergoing ES, those who received chemotherapy exhibited better OS than those who did not (P<0.05). Among the patients with PR, only PMN1 patients exhibited better OS following chemotherapy (P<0.05).
Conclusions
We developed and validated a simple, specific peritoneal metastasis model for GCPM that can predict prognosis well and guide treatment decisions.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Scientific and Technological Innovation Joint Capital Projects of Fujian Province.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
51P - Real world outcomes in elderly women with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer
Presenter: Nicole Evans
Session: e-Poster Display Session
52P - Chemotherapy selection in routine clinical practice in Japan for HER2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer (KBCRN A001: E-SPEC Study)
Presenter: Yookija Kang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
53P - Aromatase inhibitor and cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor treated HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer differ to those treated with Aromatase inhibitors alone on progression
Presenter: Indunil Weerasena
Session: e-Poster Display Session
54P - Platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer (ABC): Real-world outcome from a tertiary cancer centre in India
Presenter: Indhuja Vijesh
Session: e-Poster Display Session
55P - Eribulin in heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer: A real-world data from India
Presenter: Tanmoy Mandal
Session: e-Poster Display Session
56P - Treatment of palbociclib in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer in China: A real-world study
Presenter: Yiqi Yang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
57P - Therapeutic vulnerability of malignant phyllodes tumour to pazopanib identified through a novel patient-derived xenograft and cell line model
Presenter: Dave Ng
Session: e-Poster Display Session
58P - Survival benefit of local treatments in breast cancer with lung metastasis: Results from a large retrospective study
Presenter: Yimeng Chen
Session: e-Poster Display Session
59P - The impact of site of metastasis on overall survival in indigenous and non-indigenous patients of Western Australia with breast cancer
Presenter: Azim Khan
Session: e-Poster Display Session
60P - Risk factors of bone metastasis and skeletal-related events in high-risk breast cancer patients
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: e-Poster Display Session