Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

e-Poster Display Session

139P - An intraoperative model for predicting survival and deciding therapeutic schedules: A comprehensive analysis of peritoneal metastasis in patients with advanced gastric cancer

Date

22 Nov 2020

Session

e-Poster Display Session

Topics

Tumour Site

Gastric Cancer

Presenters

Zhi-Yu Liu

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_6): S1287-S1318. 10.1016/annonc/annonc356

Authors

Z. Liu, S. Que, J. Lin, Q. Chen, C. Zheng, P. Li, J. Xie, J. Wang, J. Lin, J. Lu, L. Cao, M. Lin, R. Tu, Z. Huang, J. Lin, H. Zheng, C. Huang

Author affiliations

  • Department Of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, 350001 - Fuzhou/CN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 139P

Background

No specialized prognosis model for gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis (GCPM) exists for intraoperative clinical decision-making. This study aims to establish a new prognostic model to provide individual treatment decisions for GCPM.

Methods

This retrospective analysis included 324 GCPM diagnosed pathologically by laparoscopy from January 2007 to January 2018 who were randomly assigned to different sets (227 in the training set and 97 in the validation set). A nomogram was established from preoperative and intraoperative variables determined by the Cox model. The peritoneal metastasis nomogram (PMN), was compared with the 15th peritoneal metastasis staging system (P1abc) for its predictive ability and clinical applicability.

Results

The median survival time was 8 (range, 1-90) months. In the training set, each PMN substage had significantly different survival curves (P<0.001), and the PMN was superior to P1abc based on the results of time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve, C-index, Akaike information criterion and likelihood ratio chi-square analyses. In the validation set, the PMN was also better than P1abc in terms of its predictive ability. Of the PMN1 patients, those undergoing palliative resection (PR) had better OS than those undergoing exploratory surgery (ES) (P<0.05). Among the patients undergoing ES, those who received chemotherapy exhibited better OS than those who did not (P<0.05). Among the patients with PR, only PMN1 patients exhibited better OS following chemotherapy (P<0.05).

Conclusions

We developed and validated a simple, specific peritoneal metastasis model for GCPM that can predict prognosis well and guide treatment decisions.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Scientific and Technological Innovation Joint Capital Projects of Fujian Province.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.