Abstract 139P
Background
No specialized prognosis model for gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis (GCPM) exists for intraoperative clinical decision-making. This study aims to establish a new prognostic model to provide individual treatment decisions for GCPM.
Methods
This retrospective analysis included 324 GCPM diagnosed pathologically by laparoscopy from January 2007 to January 2018 who were randomly assigned to different sets (227 in the training set and 97 in the validation set). A nomogram was established from preoperative and intraoperative variables determined by the Cox model. The peritoneal metastasis nomogram (PMN), was compared with the 15th peritoneal metastasis staging system (P1abc) for its predictive ability and clinical applicability.
Results
The median survival time was 8 (range, 1-90) months. In the training set, each PMN substage had significantly different survival curves (P<0.001), and the PMN was superior to P1abc based on the results of time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve, C-index, Akaike information criterion and likelihood ratio chi-square analyses. In the validation set, the PMN was also better than P1abc in terms of its predictive ability. Of the PMN1 patients, those undergoing palliative resection (PR) had better OS than those undergoing exploratory surgery (ES) (P<0.05). Among the patients undergoing ES, those who received chemotherapy exhibited better OS than those who did not (P<0.05). Among the patients with PR, only PMN1 patients exhibited better OS following chemotherapy (P<0.05).
Conclusions
We developed and validated a simple, specific peritoneal metastasis model for GCPM that can predict prognosis well and guide treatment decisions.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Scientific and Technological Innovation Joint Capital Projects of Fujian Province.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
24P - The Pink Vans: Bringing cancer screening closer to home
Presenter: Frederic Ivan Ting
Session: e-Poster Display Session
25P - Identification of gene mutations in patients with breast cancer in a region located in the southeast of the European part of Russia
Presenter: Alexander Sultanbaev
Session: e-Poster Display Session
26P - Body mass index and clinical outcomes in Egyptian women with breast cancer: A multi-institutional study
Presenter: Amrou Mamdouh Abdeen Shaaban
Session: e-Poster Display Session
27P - Breast cancer primary site and laterality as predictive factors of prognosis: SEER based analysis for survival
Presenter: Eman Zin Eldin
Session: e-Poster Display Session
28P - Breast cancer care services at Nilai Medical Centre: A Malaysian experience
Presenter: Ratnavelu Kananathan
Session: e-Poster Display Session
29P - Factors affecting breast self-examination (BSE) behaviour among female high school students in Denpasar City, Bali
Presenter: Cindy Trisina
Session: e-Poster Display Session
30P - Male breast cancer: A rural based peripheral cancer center experience
Presenter: SACHIN KHANDELWAL
Session: e-Poster Display Session
31P - The prognostic value of pre-treatment peripheral neutrophil-lymphocyte-ratio (NLR) and its correlation with mutant p53 expression in Indonesian triple negative breast cancer patients
Presenter: Rosita Purwanto
Session: e-Poster Display Session
32P - Clinicopathologic features and prognostic factors in male breast cancer: A single centre experience
Presenter: Izzet Dogan
Session: e-Poster Display Session
33P - FDG-PET predictivity of pathological axillary nodal status in carcinoma breast-upfront and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) setting
Presenter: Krithikaa Sekar
Session: e-Poster Display Session