Abstract 139P
Background
No specialized prognosis model for gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis (GCPM) exists for intraoperative clinical decision-making. This study aims to establish a new prognostic model to provide individual treatment decisions for GCPM.
Methods
This retrospective analysis included 324 GCPM diagnosed pathologically by laparoscopy from January 2007 to January 2018 who were randomly assigned to different sets (227 in the training set and 97 in the validation set). A nomogram was established from preoperative and intraoperative variables determined by the Cox model. The peritoneal metastasis nomogram (PMN), was compared with the 15th peritoneal metastasis staging system (P1abc) for its predictive ability and clinical applicability.
Results
The median survival time was 8 (range, 1-90) months. In the training set, each PMN substage had significantly different survival curves (P<0.001), and the PMN was superior to P1abc based on the results of time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve, C-index, Akaike information criterion and likelihood ratio chi-square analyses. In the validation set, the PMN was also better than P1abc in terms of its predictive ability. Of the PMN1 patients, those undergoing palliative resection (PR) had better OS than those undergoing exploratory surgery (ES) (P<0.05). Among the patients undergoing ES, those who received chemotherapy exhibited better OS than those who did not (P<0.05). Among the patients with PR, only PMN1 patients exhibited better OS following chemotherapy (P<0.05).
Conclusions
We developed and validated a simple, specific peritoneal metastasis model for GCPM that can predict prognosis well and guide treatment decisions.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Scientific and Technological Innovation Joint Capital Projects of Fujian Province.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
339P - Diclofenac versus tramadol for mucositis related pain in head and neck cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiation: A phase III study
Presenter: Vikas Talreja
Session: e-Poster Display Session
340P - Omega-3 fatty acids for cancer cachexia in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis
Presenter: Alfredo Chua
Session: e-Poster Display Session
341P - Relationship between muscle mass and quality of life in breast cancer patients who underwent chemotherapy
Presenter: Andree Kurniawan
Session: e-Poster Display Session
342P - Comparison of 0.25 mg versus 0.75 mg of palonosetron in combination with aprepitant and dexamethasone for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting following cisplatin-containing chemotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer
Presenter: Satoshi Horasawa
Session: e-Poster Display Session
343P - Head-to-head comparison of palonosetron versus granisetron for prevention of chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting: Systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Chin-Hung Hsu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
344P - Single-centre analysis of anti-resorptive agent-related osteonecrosis of the jaw in lung cancer patients
Presenter: Kohei Fujita
Session: e-Poster Display Session
345P - Thromboembolic events in brain tumour patients on bevacizumab
Presenter: Gunjesh Singh
Session: e-Poster Display Session
346P - Occurence and risk factors of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with breast cancer: A hospital-based assessment in Indonesia
Presenter: Susanna Hutajulu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
347P - Histamine blockade with loratadine for prevention of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF)-associated bone pain: A meta-analysis
Presenter: Mel Valerie Ordinario
Session: e-Poster Display Session
348P - Anti-VEGF inhibitors and renal safety in onco-nephrology consortium: Urinary protein/creatinine ratio (VERSiON UP study)
Presenter: Michio Nakamura
Session: e-Poster Display Session