Abstract 401P
Background
Afatinib is an efiective treatment for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), however, its toxicities often require dose modifications. The aim of this study was to assess the eficacy and safety of low dose afatinib monotherapy in patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC.
Methods
This study was a multicenter, single-arm, open-label phase II trial. Treatment-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC positive for common EGFR mutations received afatinib in a dose of 20mg/day. The same dose was continued unless the tumor had grown. The primary endpoint (PE) was progression-free survival (PFS) The threshold median PFS was 9.2 months and the expected median PFS 13.8 months.
Results
From March 2017 through September 2018, 53 patients were enrolled from 21 institutions in Japan. The median age was 70 years (range, 37–85), and 28 patients (52.8%) were women. EGFR mutation subtypes included exon 19 deletion (56.6%) and L858R point mutation (43.4%). Most patients had a performance status of 0 or 1 (86.8%). As of the data cut-ofi date of March 2020, the median follow-up was 20.8 months. The median PFS, time to treatment failure and overall survival were 12.6 months (95% CI: 9.7–14.3), 18.6 months (95%CI: 16.0-21.2) and not reached. The PE was met. The objective response and the disease control were 66.6% (95% CI: 51.7-78.5) and 92.5% (95% CI: 81.8-97.9). Adverse events (AEs) of grade 3 or higher occurred in 12 patients (22.6%) including diarrhea in 4 patients (7.5%) that was lower than that observed in phase III studies of afatinib using 40 mg. Eight of 19 patients (42.1%) had T790M resistant mutation in plasma and tissues. Afatinib plasma concentrations at 9 days after the start of administration had no correlations with clinical outcomes and AEs including diarrhea.
Conclusions
Low dose afatinib would be considered as one of standard therapy for EGFR mutation-positive NSCLCs because of promising clinical eficacy and good tolerability.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Thoracic Oncology Research Group.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
K. Kubota: Honoraria (self): Chugai Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, MSD, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, kyowa-hakko Kirin, AstraZeneca, Ono Pharmaceutical; Research grant/Funding (institution): Ono Pharmaceutical, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim. K. Naoki: Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim; Research grant/Funding (institution): Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim; Spouse/Financial dependant: Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim. A. Bessho: Honoraria (self): Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim. K. Minato: Research grant/Funding (institution): Taiho Pharmaceutical, Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers Squibb. N. Seki: Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca, Nipppon Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly Japan, Daiichi Sankyo, Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharmaceutical; Research grant/Funding (self): Nihon Medi-Physics, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim; Research grant/Funding (institution): AstraZeneca. T. Tokito: Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharmaceutical, MSD. N. Furuya: Honoraria (self): Eli Lilly Japan, Chugai Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Taiho Pharmaceutical, NipponBoehringer Ingelheim. H. Hayashi: Research grant/Funding (institution): Nippn Boehringer Ingelheim. H. Iihara: Research grant/Funding (institution): 19 飯原 大稔 附随研究 \"岐阜薬科大学 岐阜大学医学部附属病院” Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim. H. Okamoto: Research grant/Funding (institution): Takeda, MSD, Ono Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca, Merck, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly Japan, Daiich Sankyo. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
133P - Which patient subgroup needs more attention in early treatment failure? A matched cohort study of treatment failure patterns in locally advanced gastric cancer
Presenter: Dong Wu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
134P - Effect of preoperative tumour under-staging on the long-term survival of patients undergoing radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer
Presenter: Mi Lin
Session: e-Poster Display Session
135P - Significance of lymphatic invasion in the indication for additional gastrectomy after endoscopic treatment
Presenter: Hirohito Fujikawa
Session: e-Poster Display Session
136P - Modified ypTNM staging classification for gastric cancer after neoadjuvant therapy: A multi-institutional study
Presenter: Wen-Wu Qiu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
137P - Clinical utility of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) in resectable gastric cancer (GC)
Presenter: Mikhail Fedyanin
Session: e-Poster Display Session
138P - Prognostic importance of dynamic changes in systemic inflammatory markers for patients with gastric cancer
Presenter: Ying-Qi Huang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
139P - An intraoperative model for predicting survival and deciding therapeutic schedules: A comprehensive analysis of peritoneal metastasis in patients with advanced gastric cancer
Presenter: Zhi-Yu Liu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
140P - Preoperative and postoperative C-reactive protein levels predict recurrence and chemotherapy benefit in gastric cancer
Presenter: Li-Li Shen
Session: e-Poster Display Session
141P - Low expression of CDK5RAP3 and UFM1 indicates poor prognosis in patients with gastric cancer
Presenter: Ning-Zi Lian
Session: e-Poster Display Session
142P - Prognostic analysis of patients with intra-abdominal infectious complications after laparoscopy and open radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A propensity score-matching analysis
Presenter: Si-Jin Que
Session: e-Poster Display Session