Abstract 375O
Background
Advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (a/r EC) patients have a poor prognosis with high recurrence and mortality rate. Yet, a real-world disease burden of a/r EC is not fully elucidated. Thus, this study aimed to investigate healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), costs, and systemic anticancer therapy (SACT) patterns in these patients.
Methods
This population-based nationwide study used 15 years of Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service data (Jan. 2008 – Dec. 2022). Adult patients with newly diagnosed a/r EC were followed up for maximum 156 months from the start date of the 1st line SACT (SACT1). Patients with aEC included those who got SACT as the initial treatment, while rEC was defined as those who initiated SACT on or after the start of 2nd line of therapy (LoT2), following the surgery or radiation therapy (RT) in LoT1. All cause- and EC related-HCRU and costs, SACT patterns and prognosis were analyzed by descriptive analysis and Kaplan-Meier estimation.
Results
In total, 1,794 rEC and 910 aEC patients were included, and all cause- and EC related- HCRU tended to increase with increased line of SACT. EC-related inpatient visits in SACT1-3 were 0.6, 0.9, and 1.0 times per-patient-per-month (PPPM), and 7.8, 1.9, and 2.0 times PPPM for outpatient visits. As for a treatment pattern, platinum-based regimen was most commonly used (Table). From SACT1 to 3, the median values of both treatment duration (3.5, 2.8, and 2.0 months) and SACT-free interval showed decreasing trends (18.4, 5.0, and 3.2 months). EC-related cost, mostly inpatient cost, increased from 1,048 USD to 1,980 USD PPPM from SACT1 to 3 Table: 375O
Top 3 regimens in the 1st- to 3rd-line of SACT
SACT regimens (%) | |||
1st line (N=2,704) | 2nd line (N=837) | 3rd line (N=305) | |
1 | T+P (42.0) | D+P (25.7) | Other P-based combinationsa (31.8) |
2 | D+P (17.5) | T+P (23.1) | D+P (14.4) |
3 | P (16.0) | Other P-based combinationsa (21.2) | T+P (14.4) |
4 | Othersb (24.5) | Othersc (30.1) | Othersd (39.3) |
aP-based combinations other than T+P or D+P. bOther P-based combinations 10.4, hormone 7.1, non-P monotherapy 2.9 and other non-P based combinations 1.3%. cP 10.6, non-P monotherapy 7.7, hormone 5.5 and other non-P based combinations 1.3%. dHormone 13.1, P 13.1, non-P monotherapy 8.9 and other non-P based combi. 1.0% T+P, taxanes+platinum; D+P, doxorubicin+platinum; P, platinum.
.Conclusions
Our study reveals an increase in HCRU and costs and a decrease in treatment duration and SACT-free interval with increased line of SACT, indicating a worsening prognosis as EC progresses. Thus, the application of appropriate treatments, including new therapeutic agents, in newly diagnosed a/r EC patients is important.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
GSK Korea Ltd.
Funding
GSK Korea Ltd.
Disclosure
H. Cho, S.I. Kim, K. Kim: Financial Interests, Institutional, Principal Investigator: GSK. M.J. Bae: Financial Interests, Institutional, Project Lead: GSK. K. Kwon, C.W. Jung, Y. Lee, J. Ahn: Financial Interests, Institutional, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: GSK.
Resources from the same session
372O - Balstilimab (bal) alone or with zalifrelimab (zal) treatment for cervical cancer: An open-label, non-comparative, randomised, phase II trial
Presenter: Jusheng An
Session: Proffered Paper session: Gynaecological cancers
Resources:
Abstract
373O - First-line iparomlimab and tuvonralimab (QL1706) + chemotherapy (chemo) ± bevacizumab (BEV) for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer (r/mCC): Updated results of the phase II DUBHE-C-204 study
Presenter: Danbo Wang
Session: Proffered Paper session: Gynaecological cancers
Resources:
Abstract
374O - The burden and trends of gynecological cancers in Asia from 1980 to 2021: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2021
Presenter: Run Miao
Session: Proffered Paper session: Gynaecological cancers
Resources:
Abstract