Abstract 428P
Background
A breast cancer risk assessment tool, utilizing a polygenic risk score based on 313 single nucleotide polymorphisms and a risk prediction algorithm from the Gail Model, has been established and validated for the Asian population. Facilitated focus group discussions were conducted to assess the preferences of women from two Asian countries regarding the presentation of risk results, the level of detail provided for explanations, and recommendations for follow-up actions.
Methods
This qualitative study took place from July to October 2022 to evaluate the perspectives of women in Indonesia and Singapore regarding personalized breast cancer risk assessment. Participants were presented with either a detailed high-risk or low-risk mock report and were then assigned to high-risk or low-risk result focus groups based on the report they received randomly. Thematic analysis was performed on the content of all focus group discussions.
Results
The majority of participants emphasized the importance of using non-intimidating visuals and incorporating a summary on the first page of the report to facilitate interpretation. Participants also recommended the use of simplified language to enhance communication styles. Notably, participants who received high-risk results reported feeling anxious, while those with low-risk results expressed relief. Overall, participants found the report valuable and expressed interest in similar reports covering other diseases in the future.
Conclusions
In conclusion, the study reveals that most patients prefer test reports that strike a balance between content and complexity. It highlights the psychological impact on patients receiving test results, which is greatly influenced by their level of understanding and interpretation of the reports. Additionally, the study suggests that increased patient engagement with physicians is likely following the receipt of test results. As a result, future research could be extended to include physicians directly involved in the delivery of breast cancer prevention care.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Nalagenetics Pte Ltd.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract