Abstract 320P
Background
Ovarian cancer is 3rd most common malignancy in Indian women and 8th common cause of cancer related death in India. The aim for this study was to evaluate clinicopathological factors, patterns of treatment, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in Indian patients with advanced ovarian cancer.
Methods
This is a retrospective analysis of patients with stage III-IV ovarian cancer treated at HCG Cancer Center, Ahmedabad from June 2018- March 2023. Patients were identified using the institutional tumor registry and medical records and data was collected.
Results
Out of total 94 patients identified; 79 patients were eligible for further analysis. Median age was 55 years (range 29 to 76 years). 62 (78%) patients had stage III (IIIA-5,IIIB-3, IIIc-44) & 17 (22%) had stage IV (IVA-10, IVB-7). Most common histology was high grade serous carcinoma in 76 (96%) patients. Majority of patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interim cytoreductive surgery (CRS), [61 patients (78%)] whereas 18 patients (22 %) underwent upfront surgery. Median duration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 3 months. 21 (26.57%) patients were treated with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). 60 patients (76%) received maintenance therapy [43 patients bevacizumab, 10 patients PARP (poly ADP ribose polymerase) inhibitor and 6 patients received both]. 33 patients (41%) developed recurrence among which 32 received further chemotherapy. In recurrent setting, patients received a median 3 lines of systemic therapy (range 0-5). Genetic testing was offered to all patients at the time of diagnosis, but only 36 (45%) patients opted for it. BRCA1 mutation was detected in 8 patients (22.2%), BRCA2 mutation in 4 (11%). Median follow up was 17 months. Median PFS was 20 months with 95% CI (16-22) & Median OS was not reached, 5-year OS was 32.1%.
Conclusions
Median PFS and OS in advanced ovarian cancer at our institute is comparable to global standards. With the availability of biosimilars and genetic testing, more patients are able to access maintenance therapies. Hopefully more patients can access standard of care therapies which will help close the gap between less developed and developed countries in terms of long term outcomes.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract