Abstract 142P
Background
The TOPAZ-1 phase III trial reported a survival benefit with the anti-programmed death cell ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1) durvalumab in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). The present study investigated for the first time the survival impact resulted from the addition of durvalumab to cisplatin/gemcitabine in a real-world setting.
Methods
The analyzed population included patients with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic BTC treated with durvalumab in combination with cisplatin/gemcitabine or cisplatin/gemcitabine alone. The impact of the addition of durvalumab to chemotherapy in terms of both overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) was investigated with uni- and multivariate analysis.
Results
Overall, 358 patients were included in the analysis: 213 received cisplatin/gemcitabine alone, 145 received cisplatin/gemcitabine plus durvalumab. At the univariate analysis, the addition of durvalumab resulted to have a survival impact, since the median OS was 11.2 Vs 12.9 months (HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.3-2.5, p=0.0005) in patients who received cisplatin/gemcitabine alone compared to those who received cisplatin/gemcitabine plus durvalumab. Moreover, patients who received cisplatin/gemcitabine alone showed worse PFS compared to those who received cisplatin/gemcitabine plus durvalumab (mPFS 6.0 Vs 8.9 months, HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.4-2.3, p<0.0001). The multivariate analysis confirmed that the addition of durvalumab to cisplatin/gemcitabine is a independent prognostic factor for both OS and PFS. Finally, an exploratory analysis of the prognostic factors in the cohort of patients who received durvalumab was performed: NLR>3 and ECOG PS>0 resulted to be independent prognostic factors in terms of both OS and PFS in this cohort of patients. The interaction tests highlighted NLR>3 and ECOG>1 as predictive factors of response to cisplatin/gemcitabine plus durvalumab.
Conclusions
Accordingly, to the results of the TOPAZ-1, the addition of durvalumab to cisplatin/gemcitabine has been confirmed to confer a survival benefit in terms of both OS and PFS in a real-world setting of advanced BTC patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract