Abstract 49P
Background
There is scant data on outcomes of HER2-positive breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy in real-world, resource-constrained settings. Factors affecting outcomes in patients who achieve pathological complete response (pCR) are insufficiently explored.
Methods
This was a retrospective analysis of HER2-positive breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with or without HER2-targeted therapy between Jan 2014 & Dec 2018. The endpoints were pCR, event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS).
Results
1004 patients were included in the analysis with a median age of 47 years, 533 (53.1%) with cT3/T4, 466 (46.4%) with cN2/3, 527 (52.5%) with ER/PR-positive tumours, 528 (52.3%) received HER2-therapy with NACT, and 711 (70.8%) received it anytime during curative treatment. The 5-year EFS in all patients was 63.5% (95%CI 60.36-66.63%) and was significantly higher with pCR vs without pCR (86.1% vs 57.0%, HR 0.282, 95%CI 0.198-0.401, p=0.000), cT1/T2 vs cT3/T4 (66.8% vs 60.6%, HR 0.767, 95%CI 0.626-0.939, p=0.01), cN0/N1 vs cN2/N3 (67.9% vs 58.5%, HR 0.772, 95%CI 0.632-0.944, p=0.01), and ever-received vs never-received HER2-therapy (69.5% vs 50.1%, HR 0.537, 95%CI 0.438-0.659, p=0.000). The 5-year OS in all patients was 69.6% (95%CI 66.66-72.54%) and was significantly higher in pCR, cT1/T2, cN0/N1, and ever-received HER2-therapy subgroups. In the pCR subgroup (n=226), there was a trend towards higher 5-year EFS among patients with cT1/T2 vs cT3/T4 (90.0% vs 82.5%, HR 0.546, 95%CI 0.270-1.103, p=0.08), cN0/N1 vs cN2/N3 (89.3% vs 82.4%, HR 0.641, 95%CI 0.326-1.262, p=0.195), and ER/PR-positive) vs ER/PR-negative tumours (90.9% vs 83.0%, HR 0.609, 95%CI 0.291-1.274, p=0.183), but there was no difference between ever-received (n=204) vs never-received (n=22) HER2-therapy (86.1% vs 86.4%, HR 0.880, 95%CI 0.309-2.504, p=0.811).
Conclusions
The receipt of HER2-targeted therapy and achievement of pCR significantly impact survival of HER2-positive breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy. In patients who achieve pCR baseline disease burden tends to influence survival but not receipt of HER2-targeted therapy.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract