Abstract 47P
Background
Studies have shown disparities in management of older patients with breast cancer, resulting in undertreatment. Older patients with co-morbidities pose a challenge for cancer care providers who must balance the risk of death due to toxicity from treatment versus the benefit of standard multimodality treatment. The aim of the study was to evaluate whether the sequencing of chemotherapy and surgery impact the ability to deliver both modalities of treatment.
Methods
A retrospective analysis of prospective data was evaluated between 2018 and 2022. We included patients >60 years of age with chronic comorbidities, with a clinical stage T1c-3 and N0-3, HER2-positive or triple-negative invasive breast cancer treated with chemotherapy alone, surgery alone, or both surgery and chemotherapy. Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted to compare the survival outcomes. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS v25.
Results
A total of 821 patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 85.9% (N=705) underwent surgery as the initial treatment. Among patients who received chemotherapy first (N=116), 73.3% (N=85) were able to complete subsequent surgery. Factors associated with completion surgery after chemotherapy were younger age and clinical node-negative status. Among patients treated with surgery first, only 36.3% (N=256) received adjuvant chemotherapy. Among patients who received both modalities of treatment (N=341), women with more advanced stage tumors and those diagnosed in recent years were more likely to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy. With a median follow-up of 19.3 months, cN0 patients who underwent both surgery and chemotherapy had significantly better overall survival compared to patients who received single modality of treatment.
Conclusions
In older, triple-negative or HER2-positive breast cancer patients with comorbidities, receipt of chemotherapy and surgery was associated with improved survival. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy group were twice as likely to receive both modalities of treatment than those undergoing surgery first. A multidisciplinary approach to evaluate geriatric patients with comorbidities is essential to deliver appropriate treatment and improve outcomes in this vulnerable population.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The author.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract