Abstract 472P
Background
Radiological part-solid nodules (PSNs) containing both solid and ground-glass opacity (GGO) component has lower incidence of nodal metastasis and better prognosis than radiological solid nodules. Previous studies demonstrated that risk of recurrence in GGO-predominant PSNs (0< consolidation-to-tumor ratio ≤0.5) was negligible, while recurrence was not rare in solid- predominant PSNs (0.5< consolidation-to-tumor ratio <1). However, the detailed recurrence patterns and the role of adjuvant therapy after recurrence remained unclear in solid-predominant PSNs.
Methods
Patients with cN0 solid-predominant PSNs (0.5< consolidation-to-tumor ratio <1) undergoing surgery from 2008 to 2015 were collected. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (a) adenocarcinoma in situ or minimally invasive adenocarcinoma, (b) history of other malignancy, (c) multiple primary lesions, and (d) positive resection margin. Median follow-up time was 77.0 months. The initial recurrence site and adjuvant treatment data were collected.
Results
This study included 443 solid-predominant PSNs. Postoperative recurrence was diagnosed in 88 patients (19.9%), including 38 (8.6%) distant, 26 (5.9%) locoregional, and 24 (5.4%) combined recurrences. Lymph node metastasis (P=0.011), lymphovascular invasion (P=0.001), and larger solid component size (P=0.007) were independent predictors of postoperative recurrence. Multivariate Cox regression identified older age (P=0.014, HR=1.044) and early recurrence (P<0.001, HR=4.046) as independent predictors of decreased survival in patients who experienced recurrence. EGFR mutation and ALK rearrangement were identified in 44 (50.0%) and 3 (3.4%) patients who experienced recurrence, respectively. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors demonstrated significant advantages over chemotherapy in patients who experienced recurrence. (median overall survival: 75 vs. 52 months, P=0.004).
Conclusions
Radiological solid-predominant PSNs comprise a heterogeneous population. Active follow-up and effective adjuvant treatment is warranted in patients with risk factors of recurrence. Patients with driver mutations can greatly benefit from targeted therapy if recurrence occurs.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract