Abstract 20P
Background
In China, new breast cancer (BC) patients (pts) in county regions (including rural areas) account for more than 40% of all BC cases each year. No studies have reported the disease characteristics and treatment patterns of BC pts in China counties. This study aimed to explore the treatment patterns of BC pts in county-level hospitals in China.
Methods
CHASE001 was an observational, multicenter study assessing real-world treatment patterns among pts with HER2+ or HR+/HER2- BC conducted at 26 sites in county areas of China, including four cohorts (HER2+ early BC (eBC), HR+/HER2- eBC, HER2+ advanced BC (aBC), and HR+/HER2- aBC). The primary endpoint was treatment patterns within each cohort. The interim results for HER2+ eBC and HR+/HER2- eBC are described here.
Results
628 pts were included (302 in HER2+ eBC and 326 in HR+/HER2- eBC cohort): for HER2+ and HR+/HER2- cohort respectively, median age, 53/51 years; clinical T2, 41.39%/37.73%; clinical N0, 41.72%/45.40%. Of 584 pts who underwent breast cancer surgery, only 10.53% (30/285) received breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in HER2+ and 12.71% (38/299) in HR+/HER2- cohort. Notably, the proportions of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) following BCS were 46.67% (14/30) in HER2+ and 47.37% (18/38) in HR+/HER2- cohort. In HER2+ cohort, 20.20% (61/302) received neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) while 94.70% (286/302) received adjuvant therapy. 81.97% (50/61) of NAT were HER2 targeted regimens, of which 84.00% (42/50) received dual anti-HER2 target therapy (trastuzumab/pertuzumab). 80.77% (231/286) of adjuvant therapies were HER2 targeted regimens, of which 53.68% (124/231) were dual-targeted. Of pts with positive lymph nodes who received HER2 targeted adjuvant therapy, 75.90% applied dual anti-HER2 target therapy. In HR+/HER2- cohort, 13.50% (44/326) received NAT while 92.02% (300/326) received adjuvant therapy. The most common neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy regimens were both AC-T (41.67% and 51.79%, respectively).
Conclusions
This analysis showed unsatisfactory adherence to guidelines for BCS, RT, and NAT, but higher adherence for adjuvant anti-HER2 therapy. Further action was needed to ensure that patients in Chinese county had access to high quality and guideline centric care.
Clinical trial identification
NCT05544123.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
P. Lu.
Funding
AstraZeneca.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract