Abstract 427P
Background
Tumor tissue comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) identifies molecular targets for precision oncology but with turnaround time (TAT) around one month. We conducted tumor tissue CGP for advanced stage cancer pts from AME using a new and potentially faster tissue-based NGS platform.
Methods
Using DNA-based hybrid capture technology, Guardant360 TissueNext™ reports point mutations and insertions/deletions in 84 genes, fusions for 13 activating partners, amplification (amp) of 20 genes, tumor mutation burden (TMB) score, and microsatellite instability (MSI) status.
Results
Tumor tissue from 412 pts was tested, with success rate 87.3%. Median pt age was 61 years; 54% were male. Median TAT was 15 days (range, 6-127). Mean alteration count/sample was 3.1 (range, 1-29) and mean variant allelic frequency was 19.4% (range, 1.7-88.3). The most profiled cancers included lung (49.4%), colon or rectum (CRC; 9.0%) and breast (6.0%). TP53 (64.6%), EGFR (26.9%) and KRAS (19.0%) were the most mutated genes. EGFR (18.4%), FGFR1 (6.6%) and CCNE1 (6.6%) were the most frequently amplified genes. Fusions were identified in 30 (8.2%) pts and included ALK (2.7%), ROS1 (1.4%) and RET (1.4%). MSI-high was reported for 1.1% and TMB ≥10 mutations/Mb was found in 11.7%. For non-small cell lung cancer (n=176), alterations in genes recommended for testing by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network were mutations in EGFR (53.4%), KRAS (11.5%; 4.3% G12C), ERBB2 (3.7%) and BRAF V600E (1.4%); fusions of ALK (5.5%), ROS1 (2%), RET (2%) and NTRK1/3 (1.7% combined); MET exon14 skipping (1.7%) and MET amp (5.6%). MSI-high and TMB≥10 mutations/Mb were found in 0.7% and 12%, respectively. For CRC (n=33), informative alterations included KRAS mutations (45.4%), BRAF V600E (3%), and ERBB2 amp (6%); 1 patient each had RET and NTRK1 fusions. In breast cancer (n=22), relevant alterations included ERBB2 amp (22%) and mutations in PIK3CA (43%), ESR1 (4.8%), ERBB2 (4.8%) and BRCA1/2 (4.8%).
Conclusions
This analysis of the first tumor samples tested by a new CGP panel in AME demonstrated detection of actionable alterations at the expected frequency with only 15 days median TAT.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
N. Sandhir, S. Olsen: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Guardant Health. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract