Abstract 440P
Background
Targeted therapy is emerging as the frontline of cancer treatment due to improved clinical outcomes and enhanced quality of life among cancer patients. However, treatments related to adverse events (AEs) of targeted therapy are associated with the outcome of cancer treatments. This study investigated the frequency and severity of adverse events in cancer patients who receive targeted therapy.
Methods
The study was conducted at a university hospital in northern Thailand, from January to June 2023. We performed a retrospective study concerning patients treated with targeted therapy including multikinase inhibitors, epidermal-growth factors (EGFR) inhibitors, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors, cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, and phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI3Ks) inhibitors. All adverse events were reported by pharmacists and confirmed by medical oncologists in electronic medical record (EMR) based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. Descriptive statistics were applied for reporting frequency of AEs.
Results
There are 136 cancer patients with targeted therapy. The majority of patients were female (58.1%) with mean age 64.0 ± 11.9 years old. Non-small cell lung cancer is the most common cancer (47.1%) followed by hepatocellular carcinoma (14.7%) and breast cancer (11%). The frequency of targeted therapy treatment was erlotinib (18.4%), ceritinib (18.4%), regorafenib (10.3%) and ribociclib (8.1%). Eighty-two patients (60.3%) reported AEs. The most AEs were grade 1-2 (64%). Skin rash was the most common AE (22.8%), subsequently with dry skin (16.9%) and diarrhea (14.7%). Six patients (4.4%) had grade 3 AEs including skin rash (0.7%), Hand foot skin reaction (0.7%), transaminitis (1.5%), and neutropenia (1.5%).
Conclusions
This study demonstrated the frequency of AEs among cancer patients with targeted therapy, the most common AEs included dermatological problems. Rarely severe AEs were reported. Health care providers will need to educate and monitor cancer patients to prevent and monuments AEs during targeted therapy treatment.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract