Abstract 276P
Background
Metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) is now in abundance of treatment options. In this heterogenous group, appropriate biomarkers to choose treatment decisions are unavailable. The present study aimed to assess the prognostic significance of p53 in metastatic prostate cancer patients.
Methods
Patients ≥18 yrs of age, newly diagnosed high volume (CHAARTED criteria) mHSPC, adenocarcinoma histology & gleason score ≥8 were considered for the study. Those with known/suspected cancer susceptibility were excluded. Aim of the study was to assess the p53 status in Indian mHSPC patients, time to castration resistance and overall survival stratified as per p53 status. Eligible patients received androgen deprivation therapy and docetaxel 75mg/m2 q3weekly for 6 cycles. Immunohistochemistry for p53 was done on the prostate biopsy blocks and ≥20% nuclear immunoreactivity was considered as positive. Genomic DNA isolated from the tissue blocks was analysed for mutations in p53 exon 5 to 8 by PCR and confirmed by Sanger sequencing. At progression to CRPC, patients received therapy as per standard guidelines. The study started in 2019 after approval by the Institutional Ethics Committee.
Results
Out of 75 enrolled patients, 50 patients are eligible for present analysis. Among 50 high volume mHSPC patients, p53 was positive in 17 (34%) patients. In the overall population, progression to CRPC was seen in 26 (52%) patients at last follow up. Median follow up was 22 months. Time to CRPC in p53+ve vs. p53-ve patients was 16.6% and 37.6% (p-0.326). The 2yr OS was 51.9% vs 85.8% (p53+ve vs p53-ve respectively, p-0.041). Out of 11 samples tested, 6 (55%) mutations were found: p53 exon 8 (c.280AGA>AAA, c.287GAG>AAA, c. 279-280 GGGAGA ins GGGAAGA, c.280-281AGA>AAG) and exon 7 (c.249CGG>CGA, c.231-233 ACCACCATCCAC ins ACCACCAATCCACC). Remaining data on mutation status is being analysed.
Conclusions
This analysis shows the poor OS among p53+ve metastatic prostate cancer patients in Indian population. However, their progression after 1st-line docetaxel chemotherapy was not statistically significant. Llimitation of the study is small sample size. Differential response of p53mutant patients to other approved treatment options in this disease needs to be explored.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Indian Co-operative Oncology Network (ICON).
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract