Abstract 553P
Background
Next generation sequencing (NGS) has revolutionised the diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) yet it is resource-intensive. Exclusionary testing followed by NGS has been advocated as a cost-effective approach in Asians where EGFR mutations are prevalent. Herein we investigated the approach of plasma EGFR (pEGFR) followed by tissue NGS and compared it to upfront tissue NGS in terms of mutation detection and clinical outcome in a real world setting in Hong Kong.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed 222 patients diagnosed with advanced NSCLC from October 2021 to April 2023, including 145 cases that performed upfront tissue NGS without prior pEGFR (group 1) and 77 cases that underwent pEGFR (Cobas v2) first. Among the latter group, 48 with positive pEGFR (group 2a) started target therapy while 29 with negative pEGFR (group 2b) proceeded further tissue NGS (Oncomine precision assay). Genomic alterations and clinical data were compared among these approaches.
Results
The median age was 70, 72 and 76 years old for group 1, 2a and 2b respectively. Extrathoracic disease was found in 54%, 90% and 41% of patients in each group. Regarding genomic alterations detected by tissue NGS, sensitising EGFR mutations were found in 39% of cases in group 1, compared to only 7% in group 2b (OR 0.11, p=0.001). Additional driver mutations (EGFR exon 20 insertion, T790M, ALK, BRAF, MET exon 14 skipping, ERBB2 exon 20 insertion and KRAS) were found in 27% of group 1 cases, but up to 52% in group 2b (OR 2.92, p=0.008). For patients with EGFR mutations detected by tissue NGS, 41% had concurrent TP53 or PIK3CA mutation, which are predictive markers. The median time from radiological diagnosis to treatment initiation was 18 days for patients with positive pEGFR compared with 41 days for the counterparts underwent tissue NGS.
Conclusions
The pathway of pEGFR preceding tissue NGS allows early detection of druggable EGFR mutations and initiation of target therapy for patients with extrathoracic NSCLC but lacks simultaneous detection of predictive markers. The liquid-first approach enhances the yield of rare mutations by tissue NGS which is resource-dependent. It benefits regions where tissue biopsy is a rate limiting factor and EGFR mutations are prevalent.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract