Abstract 383P
Background
The body mass index (BMI) before therapy shows a variety of progression free survival (PFS), it was said in the BMI study <18.5 kg/m2, had a worse progression free survival, compared to BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m and BMI >24.9 kg/m2. The neutrophil lymphocyte ratio before therapy showed a variety of progression free survival (PFS). It was said that NLR ≥ 3 patients study have a better progression free survival compared to those < 3, but these results are still contradictory. The aim of this study was to determine body mass index and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio before therapy to predict 3-year progression free survival in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinom.
Methods
Patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (N=289) from 2015 until 2017 who underwent chemoradiation with and without adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy were enrolled. Body mass index before therapy was classified as <18.5 (underweight), 18.5-24.9 (normal), and >24.9 (overweight or obese) and the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio before therapy was categorized as ≥3 and <3, using the Cox proportional hazard and Kaplan-Meier models.
Results
Body mass index 18.5-24.9 and 24.9 on Cox regression has a better 3-year PFS with adjusted hazard ratio (HR = 0.219; CI = 1.43-1.59; p = 0.025 and HR = 0.136 ; CI = 1.51-1.76; p = 0.025 ), BMI <18.5 indicates a lower 3-year PFS (HR=1.644; CI=1.28-1.56; P=0.001). While NLR ≥3 before therapy had a better 3-year PFS (HR=0.152; CI 1.37-1.53, p=0.001) than NLR <3 (HR=1.603; CI 1.52-1.69, p=0.013.
Conclusions
Patients with BMI<18.5 before therapy had a lower 3-year PFS, and BMI>24.9 had a 3-year higher PFS than the normal weight group and NLR ≥3 had a higher PFS than under 3. This study provides a good understanding better between BMI and PFS and NLR and PFS, but further research is needed to confirm the result in different populations.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The author.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
16P - Patient and healthcare practitioner preferences in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer treatment: A discrete choice experiment
Presenter: Jiun-I Lai
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
17P - Initial outcomes of the ACT Now PRIME CARE for breast cancer: Prevention of Breast canceR (screening/ stage shifting) utilizing Integrated MobilE Clinics and pAtient Reported online Evaluations and Education
Presenter: Herdee Gloriane Luna
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
18P - Optimizing premenopausal HR+ HER2–ve eBC management in India: Insights from expert consensus
Presenter: Anitha Ramesh
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
19P - Referral patterns among breast cancer patients in county-level hospitals in China
Presenter: Ping Lu
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
20P - Real-world treatment of HER2+ and HR+/HER2- early breast cancer in county areas of China
Presenter: Ping Lu
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
21P - Duration of breast cancer trials: Analysis of predicted versus actual completion date
Presenter: Daniëlle Verschoor
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
22P - Impact of an online Asian genetic risk calculator on risk perception: Cancer-related distress and uptake of genetic counselling among Malaysian breast cancer patients (The ARiCa Study)
Presenter: HEAMANTHAA Padmanabhan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
23P - Consensus statements and expert recommendations for BRCAm breast cancer in the Asia-Pacific region (STREAM-AP)
Presenter: Soo Chin Lee
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
24P - Germline genetic testing for hereditary cancer: A retrospective analysis in a single site referral centre in Malaysia
Presenter: Vivian Lee
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
25P - Clinical presentations and prognostication of HER2-low breast cancer in Taiwan
Presenter: Bo-Fang Chen
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract