Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display

25P - Clinical presentations and prognostication of HER2-low breast cancer in Taiwan

Date

02 Dec 2023

Session

Poster Display

Presenters

Bo-Fang Chen

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 34 (suppl_4): S1467-S1479. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1374

Authors

C. Huang1, G. Chen1, L. Tseng2, B. Chen3

Author affiliations

  • 1 Breast Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, 11217 - Taipei City/TW
  • 2 Surgery Department, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, 11217 - Taipei City/TW
  • 3 Department Of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, 11217 - Taipei City/TW

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 25P

Background

With the advent of novel antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), an emerging subgroup of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low breast cancer has been recognized which may take advantage from the anti-tumor activity. We took advantage of Taiwan Cancer Registry (TCR) to evaluate the clinical presentations and prognostication for HER2-low breast cancer.

Methods

HER2-low breast cancers were defined operationally with HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) 1+ or 2+ with a negative fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) while HER2-zero defined with an IHC score 0. Breast cancer index cases (n=189465) from TCR between 2007 and 2017 were reduced to 133546 sides of breast cancer per subject. Clinical features such as IHC test, stage, grade and outcomes such as relapse-free and overall survival were compared between HER2-low and HER2-zero.

Results

The safety analysis group comprised 37195 HER2-negative breast cancers, including 14288 IHC 1+, 10486 FISH-negative, 8907 IHC 0 and 3323 IHC 2+/FISH-undetermined cases. Among HER2-negative breast cancers, the proportion of HER2-low and HER2-zero was 68.9% and 31.1%, respectively, after excluding HER2 ambiguity. Overall survival was 95.7% versus 95.9% for HER2-low and HER2-zero breast cancers, which was 94.1% and 94.7% for relapse-free survival. The distributions of pathological stages from 0 to IV were 6.7%, 41.5%, 38.5%, 13.1% and 0.3% for HER2-low and were 8.5%, 42.8%, 37.5%, 11% and 0.4% for HER2-zero breast cancers. Regarding estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status, 87.6% and 80.9% of the HER2-low cases were ER+ and PR+ while 81.9% and 74.8% of the HER2-zero patients were ER+ and PR+. High or poorly differentiated grade was reported from 23.4% of HER2-low and 25.5% of HER2-zero breast cancers. The diagnosed age was 54 versus 54.3 between HER2-low and HER2-zero breast cancers (P=0.02).

Conclusions

HER2-low status is not a prognostic marker for Taiwanese breast cancers while a slightly younger age of disease onset, less than half diagnosed with stage 0 and I, more ER and PR positivity and fewer grade III disease were observed for HER2-low phenotype compared with HER2-zero counterpart. These trivial differences distinguished HER2-low from HER2-zero spectrum among Taiwanese HER2-negative breast cancers.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

LMT.

Funding

Melissa Lee Cancer Foundation.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.