Abstract 155P
Background
Chemotherapy currently serves as the cornerstone for treating metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC). Nevertheless, the effectiveness of chemotherapy have yet to fully align with the demands and preferences of patients. There is an urgent necessity to delve into novel treatment avenues. Therefore, it is worth to assess the clinical value of combination of all three treatments. This study aims to evaluate the preliminary effectiveness and safety of penpulimab combined with anlotinib and nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (PAAG) for mPC.
Methods
We conducted a phase Ⅱ prospective, single-arm, multicenter study involving first-line patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed mPC. Patients received penpulimab (200mg, IV, D1) and Anlotinib (12mg, P.O, QD, D1-14), in addition to nab-paclitaxel (125mg/m2, I.V, D1,8) and gemcitabine (1.0g/m2, I.V, D1,8), administered over a 21-day treatment cycle. The primary endpoints included the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR), while secondary endpoints encompassed Overall Survival (OS) (median), Progression-free Survival (PFS) (median), and safety.
Results
Between June 2022 and August 2023, 66 patients were enrolled. The longest treatment duration observed was 17 months. Out of these, 65 patients were eligible for response evaluation. The best response, indicated by the ORR, was recorded at 43% (28/65) (95%CI, 30.8-56.0), with 28 patients achieving partial response (PR). Notably, DCR stood at an impressive 95% (62/65) (95%CI, 87.1-99.0). The median PFS was calculated as 8.7 months. Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 39% patients (26/66). In prespecified exploratory transcriptomic biomarkers analysis, significantly higher expression of IFN-γ, T cell recruiting and Th17 recruiting scores were detected in CR/PR patients compared with SD/PD patients.
Conclusions
PAAG as first-line treatment demonstrated a promising efficacy and manageable AEs for mPC. Biomarkers identified in this study possessed the potential to guide the precise clinical application of PAAG.
Clinical trial identification
NCT05493995.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Juan Du.
Funding
Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract