Abstract 184P
Background
Pancreatic cancer remains a highly lethal malignancy with limited treatment options for metastatic and recurrent cases. Nanoliposomal-irinotecan and fluorouracil with leucovorin (NFF) has emerged as the standard treatment following gemcitabine-based regimens. However, the relationship between treatment outcomes and neutropenia in pancreatic cancer has not been thoroughly investigated.
Methods
In this retrospective study, we analyzed data from 161 patients with pancreatic cancer treated with NFF. Neutropenia was assessed based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) cutoffs: Cutoff A (CTCAE Grade 0 versus Grade 1–4), Cutoff B (Grade 0–1 versus Grade 2–4), and Cutoff C (Grade 0–2 versus Grade 3–4). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), while secondary endpoints included response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS), and relative dose intensity (RDI).
Results
Among the 161 patients, 93/8/22/30/8 had Grade 0/1/2/3/4 neutropenia, respectively. Baseline patient characteristics, including white blood cell (WBC) count, neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, and FU RDI, exhibited significant differences (p<0.05) between two groups separated by Cutoff A and Cutoff B. Additionally, WBC count, neutrophil count, and FU RDI differed significantly (p<0.05) at Cutoff C. Fisher’s exact test revealed significant differences (p<0.05) in RR at Cutoff C, with the odds ratio of Cutoff C being the greatest, followed by Cutoff B and A. Regarding OS, there were significant differences at Cutoff A (hazard ratio (HR), 0.65; 95% CI, 0.44–0.94; p<0.05) and Cutoff B (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.43–0.92; p<0.05), but not at Cutoff C (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.47–1.14; p=0.16). Furthermore, there were significant differences in PFS at Cutoff A and B (p<0.05). Cox regression analysis indicated that neutropenia was significantly associated with OS at Cutoff A and B (adjusted p<0.05).
Conclusions
NFF-induced neutropenia exhibits significant potential as both a predictive factor for treatment response and a prognostic factor for OS in patients with pancreatic cancer.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract