Abstract 338P
Background
Nasal type NKTCL refers to upper aerodigestive tract (UAT) involvement while non-nasal type does not involve UAT at initial diagnosis. Since NKTCLs are predominantly nasal type, there remains little knowledge of non-nasal type disease.
Methods
Newly diagnosed advanced-stage non-nasal and nasal type NKTCL patients from two large cancer centers in the past 10-15 years were retrospectively collected.
Results
The study included 56 non-nasal type NKTCL patients with 139 nasal cases as controls. The non-nasal type NKTCLs exhibited higher Ki-67 expression levels compared to nasal cases (P=0.011) with no significant differences in other baseline features. With a median follow-up of 75.03 months, the non-nasal group showed slightly inferior overall survival (OS) compared to the nasal group (median OS [mOS]: 14.57 vs. 21.53 months, P=0.120). ECOG score≥2 (hazard ratio [HR]=2.18, P=0.039) and LDH elevation (HR=2.44, P=0.012) were correlated with worse OS, and the modified nomogram-revised risk index (NRI) and international prognostic index (IPI) functioned effectively for prognostic stratification. Multi- compared to single-modality therapy led to significantly superior progression-free survival (PFS) and OS (median PFS [mPFS]: 11.53 vs. 2.03 months, P=0.001; mOS: 52.80 vs. 7.70 months, P=0.006). Chemoradiotherapy combination significantly improved survival compared to other modalities (mPFS: 14.00 vs. 3.47 months, P=0.050; mOS: 56.40 vs. 9.30 months, P=0.046), and gemcitabine- compared to non-gemcitabine-based regimens showed a trend towards slightly improved outcomes (mPFS: 10.43 vs. 3.40 months, P=0.106; mOS: 25.13 vs. 9.30 months, P=0.125). Table: 338P
Prognostic stratification of advanced-stage non-nasal type ENKTLs
Model | Variable | Risk stratification | Score | Non-nasal type (n=56) (%) | Nasal type (n=139) (%) |
Modified NRI | Age (>60 vs. ≤60 years)ECOG score (≥2 vs. 0-1) Elevated LDH (yes vs. no) | low risk | 0 | 16(28.6) | 46(33.1) |
high risk | 1 | 30(53.6) | 71(51.1) | ||
2 | 5(8.9) | 20(14.4) | |||
3 | 5(8.9) | 2(1.4) | |||
Modified PINK | Age (>60 vs. ≤60 years) Non-nasal type (yes vs. no) | / | 0 | 0 | 121(87.1) |
1 | 45(80.4) | 18(12.9) | |||
2 | 11(19.6) | 0 | |||
Modified IPI | Age (>60 vs. ≤60 years)ECOG score (≥2 vs. 0-1)Elevated LDH (yes vs. no)Extranodal involvement (≥2 vs. 0-1) | low risk | 0 | 2(3.6) | 6(4.3) |
1 | 16(28.6) | 46(33.1) | |||
high risk | 2 | 28(50.0) | 66(47.5) | ||
3 | 5(8.9) | 19(13.7) | |||
4 | 5(8.9) | 2(1.4) |
Conclusions
Advanced-stage non-nasal type NKTCL patients could achieve comparable prognosis with nasal cases after rational comprehensive therapy. Potent therapy is preferred in young patients with previously untreated disease, good performance status, and relatively low tumor burden.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Chinese Geriatric Oncology Society Scientific Research Fund (CGOS-06-2014-1-1-01600).
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
16P - Patient and healthcare practitioner preferences in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer treatment: A discrete choice experiment
Presenter: Jiun-I Lai
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
17P - Initial outcomes of the ACT Now PRIME CARE for breast cancer: Prevention of Breast canceR (screening/ stage shifting) utilizing Integrated MobilE Clinics and pAtient Reported online Evaluations and Education
Presenter: Herdee Gloriane Luna
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
18P - Optimizing premenopausal HR+ HER2–ve eBC management in India: Insights from expert consensus
Presenter: Anitha Ramesh
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
19P - Referral patterns among breast cancer patients in county-level hospitals in China
Presenter: Ping Lu
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
20P - Real-world treatment of HER2+ and HR+/HER2- early breast cancer in county areas of China
Presenter: Ping Lu
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
21P - Duration of breast cancer trials: Analysis of predicted versus actual completion date
Presenter: Daniëlle Verschoor
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
22P - Impact of an online Asian genetic risk calculator on risk perception: Cancer-related distress and uptake of genetic counselling among Malaysian breast cancer patients (The ARiCa Study)
Presenter: HEAMANTHAA Padmanabhan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
23P - Consensus statements and expert recommendations for BRCAm breast cancer in the Asia-Pacific region (STREAM-AP)
Presenter: Soo Chin Lee
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
24P - Germline genetic testing for hereditary cancer: A retrospective analysis in a single site referral centre in Malaysia
Presenter: Vivian Lee
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
25P - Clinical presentations and prognostication of HER2-low breast cancer in Taiwan
Presenter: Bo-Fang Chen
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract