Abstract 298P
Background
Cervical Cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer mortality in Indian women.Most of the women present in advanced stages of cervical cancer. Although CTRT remains the standard of care there were several challenges in implementation. In this study we assesed 3-year outcomes of LACC patients and the factors impacted the outcome.
Methods
We retrospectively analysed the records and follow up data of 131 patients of locally advanced cervical cancer registered in 2019. We noted the baseline characteristics include demographic data, comorbidities, histology and stage, treatment details, follow up data which include their disease status, death. Table: 298P
Baseline characterstics
Variables | N=131 | (%) | |
Comorbidities | |||
Diabetes Mellitus | 19 | 14.5 | |
Hypertension | 18 | 13.7 | |
Others | 16 | 12.2 | |
None | 78 | 59.5 | |
ECOG | |||
1 | 98 | 74.8 | |
2 | 29 | 22.1 | |
3 | 4 | 3.1 | |
Histology | |||
Squamous Cell Carcinoma | 121 | 92.4 | |
Adenocarcinoma | 6 | 4.6 | |
Others | 4 | 3.1 | |
Stage (FIGO 2018) | |||
IB | 8 | 6.1 | |
IIA | 5 | 3.8 | |
IIB | 47 | 35.9 | |
IIIA | 6 | 4.6 | |
IIIB | 47 | 35.9 | |
IIIC1 | 9 | 6.9 | |
IIIC2 | 3 | 2.3 | |
IVA | 6 | 4.6 |
Results
The median follow-up time was 45.5 months (IQR - 39.7-47.4). 5 patients had defaulted radiotherapy, 5 defaulted brachytherapy and 9 deferred brachytherapy. The average time from diagnosis to start of treatment is 109 days. 3-year OS was 78.6%. Stage-wise survival was IB (100%), IIA (100%), IIB (78.7%), IIIA (83.3%), IIIB (78.7%), IIIC (66.6%) & IVA (50%). 82.4% in CTRT patients and 72.4% in RT alone were alive. Dose >85Gy resulted in better local control and survival. The 3-year OS of patients with Overall Treatment Time <56 days is 89.1% while OTT >56 days is 80.7% (p=0.215).
Conclusions
The findings of this study highlighted the importance of concurrent chemoradiation in locally advanced cervical cancer. Doses >85 Gy to the disease and OTT <56 days showed better outcomes. Strategies to improve compliance to CTRT and image-guided adaptive brachytherapy will help in improved local control and survival. In low-middle income countries, these outcomes are also impacted by non-compliance and long wait-list to treatment, which is often due to logistical and socio-cultural barriers.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract